Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,519 readers

3,374 active

448 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

How effective are ads? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 10 months ago by wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

lol no. Branding is not advertising just like getting smacked in the face isn't domestic abuse unless the context is correct.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 point 10 months ago

Beating my children (consensually) to prove packaging with the purpose of attracting attention isn't advertising

permalink

fedilink

source

parent