▲ 674 ▼ Researchers took 44 men and gave either plant-protein or animal-protein supplements for 12 weeks while strength training. There was no statistical difference in muscle strength or mass between groups (www.tandfonline.com) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.world 250 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (18 children) I wish more people understood that EVERYTHING is chemistry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] PatTheBunny@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (9 children) Even love? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) Especially group sex permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) with 44 men, so an orgy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That's gay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent [–] teolan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, watt is love, so love is energy over time, not chemistry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, Shrek is love, Shrek is life. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course! Even love! Just mix a dash of dopamine, a sprinkle of serotonin, a shot of oxytocin, and a hint of norepinephrine. Shake well in a nervous system, serve warm, and call it love! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Would you like a side of pheromones with that? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) And all of chemistry is just physics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) What about consciousness? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Truly the strangest epiphenomenon we're all aware of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Or is it an epiphenomenon... No one can tell IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Is self awareness of information processing and filtering. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Well, except for nuclear physics... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PatTheBunny@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (9 children) Even love? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) Especially group sex permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) with 44 men, so an orgy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That's gay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent [–] teolan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, watt is love, so love is energy over time, not chemistry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, Shrek is love, Shrek is life. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course! Even love! Just mix a dash of dopamine, a sprinkle of serotonin, a shot of oxytocin, and a hint of norepinephrine. Shake well in a nervous system, serve warm, and call it love! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Would you like a side of pheromones with that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) Especially group sex permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) with 44 men, so an orgy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That's gay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago (3 children) with 44 men, so an orgy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That's gay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That's gay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Gay chemistry! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago Homosexual alchemy permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teolan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, watt is love, so love is energy over time, not chemistry. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, Shrek is love, Shrek is life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago No, Shrek is love, Shrek is life. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course! Even love! Just mix a dash of dopamine, a sprinkle of serotonin, a shot of oxytocin, and a hint of norepinephrine. Shake well in a nervous system, serve warm, and call it love! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Would you like a side of pheromones with that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Would you like a side of pheromones with that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (6 children) And all of chemistry is just physics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) What about consciousness? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Truly the strangest epiphenomenon we're all aware of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Or is it an epiphenomenon... No one can tell IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Is self awareness of information processing and filtering. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) What about consciousness? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Truly the strangest epiphenomenon we're all aware of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Or is it an epiphenomenon... No one can tell IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Is self awareness of information processing and filtering. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Truly the strangest epiphenomenon we're all aware of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Or is it an epiphenomenon... No one can tell IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Or is it an epiphenomenon... No one can tell IMO. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're certainly not wrong! To me, it seems that consciousness is just what it is to be the kind of machines that we are, and also why sentience/consciousness is so impossible for the sort of synthetic 'AI's we have that currently exist. But how could we ever really tell? Hard to know what evidence would ever be convincing either way! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Exactly! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago* Is self awareness of information processing and filtering. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Well, except for nuclear physics... permalink fedilink source parent