Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,529 readers

3,390 active

487 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

How effective are ads? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 10 months ago by wuphysics87@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In terms of cost of an ad to earnings, and how well, even a targeted ad, can hold a viewer's attention. Have we just become numb to ads? Does targeted advertising actually yield better results?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 1 point 10 months ago

lmao i added to the word of mouth here, that was the point.

ofcourse HP sells more. they're a market monopoly that polemically and aggressively remove common knowledge of competitors when able to.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent