submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 3 years ago* (8 children)

It's nice here, but we aren't totally safe from drama either. In the Kbin Codeberg for example, issue #196 attracted the ire of another developer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    Care to elaborate what was said?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's not overly long or complicated but here's a summary:

    Original: Codeberg Kbin/kbin-core, Issue #196

    OP: Hey Kbin dev, you're using my code without attribution.

    [Comments from other users]

    Kbin dev: Oops, my bad. Here are a couple ways I can fix it. What would you prefer?

    OP: Attribution.

    [Additional comments about license stuff and the nature of open source software]

    Kbin dev: Working on it.

    OP: [Details of suggested fix].

    Fix

    Issue closed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    I was part of that discussion. There was an ongoing attribution issue where a person claimed their open source project wasn't being attributed correctly (where it looks like kbin is forked from another older project)

    With the Reddit migration and a range of other issues, old mate who manages kbin didn't get around to fixing the attribution (choosing to focus on getting the server stable and fixing actual issues)

    It got brough up again last week in a not so flattering post and within a day or two it was resolved (putting to bed the idea that old mate is actually out to steal people's code)

    Not a great situation overall but it's great it's been resolved 🦙🦙🦙

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Kbin uses codeberg? I might move to kbin because they're chad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments