โฒ 722 โผ Germany decides against supporting chat control (www.patrick-breyer.de) submitted 11 months ago by PonyOfWar@pawb.social to c/europe@feddit.org 48 comments fedilink hide all child comments ...again. If it sounds familiar it's not just you. But they've been back on "undecided" shortly after. Let's hope this is the actual final decision.
[โ] PonyOfWar@pawb.social [S] 20 points 11 months ago (1 child) I guess ideally, we should put the right to encrypted communication into law or even into national constitutions. Unlikely to happen though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Finland already has it in constitution, though it's not about encryption but just right to privacy on private messaging. It was originally created to protect snail mail communication permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 11 months ago (1 child) Finland already has it in constitution, though it's not about encryption but just right to privacy on private messaging. It was originally created to protect snail mail communication permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent