276
Head of the Signal app threatens to withdraw from Europe (www.bluewin.ch)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/50130760

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

Signal is nice because it has a pretty good adoption rate even with non techies (which is why they've been mentioned by name in the chat control proposal). But privacy enthusiasts will still have briar/simplechat/xmpp. Those aren't centralised like Signal and will be a lot harder to regulate

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    ChatControl 2.0, if passed means your entire device is backdoored so it doesn’t matter what apps you installl, they can get your info pre-encryption

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Custom roms is your best bed at that point. I do use GOS already.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    It's great as long as you can guarantee that the person you're communicating on the receiving side does the same. Otherwise it's useless as your messages will be read on the receiving device. In practice it will make private communication extremely cumbersome and niche.

    Also, the authorities can backdoor your custom ROM device at will, when seized.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Steganography. There’s more than one way to protect your communication.

    And encryption in transit is better than no encryption at all (assuming the baddies don’t already have full access to your phone data).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    assuming the baddies don’t already have full access to your phone data

    That's the whole point of Chat Control 2.0

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Not quite; Chat Control hearkens back to Apple’s doomed attempt at on-device CSAM filtering - the idea is that on-device images and message contents would be scanned for known hashes. This means a nation state could go fishing on devices for known content, but it wouldn’t allow them to indiscriminately sift through all the content at rest — they’d have to know what they were looking for.

    That’s where the steganography comes in, because the hash based approach will fail if the content they’re looking for is obscured in some manner.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Unless you outlaw alternative ROMs some devices will be not backdoored.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    They will begin so, but the regulation means the authorities can backdoor your device way easier than they can today. It doesn't mean your custom ROM device will be free of the scanning software forever.

    It also means that you need to know that the receiving device you're communicating with is clean custom ROM device, otherwise your messages will be scanned on the receiving side.

    The regulation is a complete shitshow privacy nightmare hiding under CSAM trenchcoat. We'd do well to organize and fight against it, instead of trying to back down to the perceived safety of esoteric custom ROMs.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I like to be in control of what happens on the hardware I own and what services I use. If given no choice I will cease using them altogether. I agree that the law is an absolute shitshow, but with the recent speedrun to totalitarianism we should not fool ourselved that it won't be passed. It will be, eventually. It doesn't hurt to start digging the trenches meanwhile. For it is a war.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    You won't be able to install those apps soon after Android bans sideloading of apps that aren't signed, or bans sideloading of apps that are not from the playstore itself.

    What then?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I don't think privacy enthusiasts use vanilla Android. People will stick to Lineage/Graphene for as long as it works and then switch to something like Postmarket. It's already in a state where it's rough but usable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Europe: Companies can't lock down your operating system.

    Also Europe: Companies must force back doors into their operating systems.

    I wonder how long those two things can coexist.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Well, Google’s current behaviour is already putting the future existence of F-Droid into question.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    We need FOSS phones badly and in numbers that manufacturing isn't horrible. That is until our governments force carriers not to connect them.

    If I could find a reasonably priced 8" Linux tablet, I'd sell my phone and buy a cellular wifi AP.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •