▲ 1229 ▼ Google's shocking developer decree struggles to justify the urgent threat to F-Droid (www.neowin.net) submitted 11 months ago by ardi60@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 298 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 29 points 11 months ago (4 children) Not always. It can also be about the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago About keeping the children safe permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children) That's also security. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not really, it’s more about children not being exposed to things usually. Hence starting with age requirements for porn and they move forward to other things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago "Protecting the children from harmful content and predators", "protecting people from terrorists and criminals", "protecting users from hackers" are all forms of security, and are all used as arguments to erode freedoms. It all boils down to: just give up this bit of freedom so we can keep everyone safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago About keeping the children safe permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children) That's also security. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not really, it’s more about children not being exposed to things usually. Hence starting with age requirements for porn and they move forward to other things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago "Protecting the children from harmful content and predators", "protecting people from terrorists and criminals", "protecting users from hackers" are all forms of security, and are all used as arguments to erode freedoms. It all boils down to: just give up this bit of freedom so we can keep everyone safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not really, it’s more about children not being exposed to things usually. Hence starting with age requirements for porn and they move forward to other things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago "Protecting the children from harmful content and predators", "protecting people from terrorists and criminals", "protecting users from hackers" are all forms of security, and are all used as arguments to erode freedoms. It all boils down to: just give up this bit of freedom so we can keep everyone safe. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago "Protecting the children from harmful content and predators", "protecting people from terrorists and criminals", "protecting users from hackers" are all forms of security, and are all used as arguments to erode freedoms. It all boils down to: just give up this bit of freedom so we can keep everyone safe. permalink fedilink source parent