▲ 1134 ▼ electruleician (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com) submitted 11 months ago by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] stephan262@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like sender/receiver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like sender/receiver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent