electruleician (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed.

  • source
  • parent