▲ 1134 ▼ electruleician (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com) submitted 11 months ago by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LOLseas@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (6 children) Master/slave terminology needs to die off. What a blatant callback to slavery times. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago (2 children) Should be using Dom/Sub amirite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LOLseas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Oh, surely you must've meant Kermit/Miss Piggy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 11 months ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like parent/child. Add something? Parent adopts. Remove something? Parent abandons, leaving the process or component with trauma that will require years of therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Then you get people asking how you kill abandoned child processes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago -9 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago "All orphans will eventually become zombies" -My OS lecturer last year permalink fedilink source parent [–] stephan262@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like sender/receiver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago Noo! It just needs to become kinky instead. permalink fedilink source parent [–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago leader/follower for things like Paxos and RAID arrays works okay. permalink fedilink source parent [–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago I think it would be less of an issue if human slavery and all its attendant and resultant issues were actually firmly a thing of the past. It could become a "clinical", accurate way to describe technical constellations where one component is strictly subordinate to another, if it didn't have the connotation of ongoing human rights issues. Not saying it's the best or the only option for the terminology, just wondering aloud whether the callback would be an issue if the topic wasn't still so raw and sore. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago (2 children) Should be using Dom/Sub amirite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LOLseas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Oh, surely you must've meant Kermit/Miss Piggy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 point 11 months ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LOLseas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago Oh, surely you must've meant Kermit/Miss Piggy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like parent/child. Add something? Parent adopts. Remove something? Parent abandons, leaving the process or component with trauma that will require years of therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Then you get people asking how you kill abandoned child processes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago -9 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago "All orphans will eventually become zombies" -My OS lecturer last year permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children) Then you get people asking how you kill abandoned child processes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago -9 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago "All orphans will eventually become zombies" -My OS lecturer last year permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Unlix86@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 11 months ago "All orphans will eventually become zombies" -My OS lecturer last year permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stephan262@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) I quite agree. Personally I use Main/Secondary, I find it does away with the problematic terminology while needing no changes in acronyms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like sender/receiver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarthFreyr@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago Eh, I think master is used (AFAIK) unproblematicly in other contexts like a master key, recording master, and master pattern. Converting it to "main" seems like a change or loss of meaning, but the problem may be that there is not really a consistent meaning across electronics usage to start with. I think "secondary" has some connotation of filling the same purpose or type as the primary, which doesn't really fit for m/s usage. Master/sheep is my most similar option that keeps the "m/s", but it feels awkward enough to draw attention to what it replaces. Could just do master (or main) and sub, where "sub" could mean substitute, subordinate, subscriber, [submissive,] etc. as needed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) I like sender/receiver permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Pitcher/catcher? No, no, perhaps not. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago top/bottom permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago Noo! It just needs to become kinky instead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 months ago leader/follower for things like Paxos and RAID arrays works okay. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago I think it would be less of an issue if human slavery and all its attendant and resultant issues were actually firmly a thing of the past. It could become a "clinical", accurate way to describe technical constellations where one component is strictly subordinate to another, if it didn't have the connotation of ongoing human rights issues. Not saying it's the best or the only option for the terminology, just wondering aloud whether the callback would be an issue if the topic wasn't still so raw and sore. permalink fedilink source parent