you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 11 months ago (14 children)

There's nothing about integrating anything (I assume you mean Cloudflare turnstile?). It's Cloudflare giving money to projects they like. Apparently Ladybird also has a 100k per donor limit, so that's the max Cloudflare can give (annually?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (13 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (12 children)

    Remind me, which browser is Cloudlfare making?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (10 children)

    You compared the Cloudflare situation to "taking money from Google" and added that due to Ladybird taking money from Cloudflare, they're "not challenging the status quo".

    Ladybird being a browser has absolutely no bearing on webhosting and the only status quo it can challenge is in the browser market. Which implies that you think Cloudflare has something to do with the browser market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Again: what does Cloudflare have to do with the browser market...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (6 children)

    they have the capability to do more.

    And you don't think that financing a third party browser to break the duopoly is "doing more"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    This is like saying "the duopoly that reigns the water is Maersk and Smartwater", two companies that do completely different things that just happen to be related to water...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Mate, we're talking about the BROWSER MARKET.

    Even assuming Ladybird somehow gains 100% of that market, completely kicking out anything Chromium related, it has ZERO bearing on who people choose for their host! Cloudflare currently has around 20% of that market, and if Ladybird - today - goes up to 100% share of the browser market, Cloudflare will still hold 20% of hosting!

    You're talking about some overarching Internet revolution, while the thread is about a single aspect of how people reach the Internet!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    browsers are not a market in themselves, browsers are used to browse the internet. they are irrelevant without the context around it.

    Google's Chrome used to be only about 60% compliant with W3C guidelines. They still became the de-facto default browser and so the guidelines changed to better match Chrome's interpretation.

    if google or cloudflare decide to create some bullshit attestation system to lock alternatives out and vendors adopt it,

    It's already happened when Microsoft released the first version of Edge. Google killed it by making it "incompatible" with its services.

    and they seem to be scoping out how to do just that.

    Cloudflare? By giving money to a project aiming at breaking up the duopoly...?

  • source
  • parent