▲ 803 ▼ Assigned baby at birth (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com) submitted 11 months ago by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 33 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 91 points 11 months ago (2 children) That's dumb, the baby is obviously ~9 months old when born. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 17 points 11 months ago (3 children) Isn't this legitimately how Koreans count their age? Like, I think you pop out as a 1 year old according to their age system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] axexrx@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (2 children) From what I understand, they've been using the 'normal' system for most legal things since the 60s, and that was just how they socially talked about age, until it was abandoned in 2023. The old system also added a year on New years, not on your birthday. Meaning a baby born 2 days ago would be 2 years old if they were born on December 31. Apparently, laws do still keep that standard for some age based regulations, like school, drinking age, voting age, and draft. Which kind of makes sense; everyone born in X year gains those things at the same time. A less arbitrary cut off date for schools, no awkward math whe checking IDs, just born in '04, you're good.' Still seems confusing having 3 ages in different contexts though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago Thanks for the context! I went to school with a couple of Korean international students who explained their age hierarchy to me once, but I didn't really grasp the intricacies of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren't often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with "baby", "junior", etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It was also counted from the beginning of the year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_age_reckoning but they oficially switched in 2023 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago Oh that's kind of sad. It must have been pretty convenient to have everyone from the same year legally age up at once, from a bureaucratic standpoint at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Aren't they getting one year every 1 January or something like that? permalink fedilink source parent [–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 11 points 11 months ago (2 children) This has always bothered me about the bullshit pro-life argument. If life starts at conception, then clearly we're making people wait an additional 9 months to vote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago There is actually one problem with counting age from birth: premature babies are behind on everything! Of course we could correct that by saying that they were minus three months old when born (or however early they are). permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) That's it, we'll have to get rid of democracy now, there's too many flaws. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago We never had a proper democracy, so consider it done/moot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 17 points 11 months ago (3 children) Isn't this legitimately how Koreans count their age? Like, I think you pop out as a 1 year old according to their age system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] axexrx@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (2 children) From what I understand, they've been using the 'normal' system for most legal things since the 60s, and that was just how they socially talked about age, until it was abandoned in 2023. The old system also added a year on New years, not on your birthday. Meaning a baby born 2 days ago would be 2 years old if they were born on December 31. Apparently, laws do still keep that standard for some age based regulations, like school, drinking age, voting age, and draft. Which kind of makes sense; everyone born in X year gains those things at the same time. A less arbitrary cut off date for schools, no awkward math whe checking IDs, just born in '04, you're good.' Still seems confusing having 3 ages in different contexts though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago Thanks for the context! I went to school with a couple of Korean international students who explained their age hierarchy to me once, but I didn't really grasp the intricacies of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren't often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with "baby", "junior", etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It was also counted from the beginning of the year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_age_reckoning but they oficially switched in 2023 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago Oh that's kind of sad. It must have been pretty convenient to have everyone from the same year legally age up at once, from a bureaucratic standpoint at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Aren't they getting one year every 1 January or something like that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (2 children) From what I understand, they've been using the 'normal' system for most legal things since the 60s, and that was just how they socially talked about age, until it was abandoned in 2023. The old system also added a year on New years, not on your birthday. Meaning a baby born 2 days ago would be 2 years old if they were born on December 31. Apparently, laws do still keep that standard for some age based regulations, like school, drinking age, voting age, and draft. Which kind of makes sense; everyone born in X year gains those things at the same time. A less arbitrary cut off date for schools, no awkward math whe checking IDs, just born in '04, you're good.' Still seems confusing having 3 ages in different contexts though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago Thanks for the context! I went to school with a couple of Korean international students who explained their age hierarchy to me once, but I didn't really grasp the intricacies of it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren't often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with "baby", "junior", etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago Thanks for the context! I went to school with a couple of Korean international students who explained their age hierarchy to me once, but I didn't really grasp the intricacies of it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren't often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with "baby", "junior", etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago It wasn't because of a hesitance to misname them. It was purely because of mortality rates. I appreciate your optimism, though. 🥹 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) It was also counted from the beginning of the year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_age_reckoning but they oficially switched in 2023 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago Oh that's kind of sad. It must have been pretty convenient to have everyone from the same year legally age up at once, from a bureaucratic standpoint at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago Oh that's kind of sad. It must have been pretty convenient to have everyone from the same year legally age up at once, from a bureaucratic standpoint at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago Aren't they getting one year every 1 January or something like that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 11 points 11 months ago (2 children) This has always bothered me about the bullshit pro-life argument. If life starts at conception, then clearly we're making people wait an additional 9 months to vote. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago There is actually one problem with counting age from birth: premature babies are behind on everything! Of course we could correct that by saying that they were minus three months old when born (or however early they are). permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) That's it, we'll have to get rid of democracy now, there's too many flaws. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago We never had a proper democracy, so consider it done/moot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago There is actually one problem with counting age from birth: premature babies are behind on everything! Of course we could correct that by saying that they were minus three months old when born (or however early they are). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago (1 child) That's it, we'll have to get rid of democracy now, there's too many flaws. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago We never had a proper democracy, so consider it done/moot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago We never had a proper democracy, so consider it done/moot. permalink fedilink source parent