Assigned baby at birth (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 91 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's dumb, the baby is obviously ~9 months old when born.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Isn't this legitimately how Koreans count their age? Like, I think you pop out as a 1 year old according to their age system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    From what I understand, they've been using the 'normal' system for most legal things since the 60s, and that was just how they socially talked about age, until it was abandoned in 2023.

    The old system also added a year on New years, not on your birthday. Meaning a baby born 2 days ago would be 2 years old if they were born on December 31. Apparently, laws do still keep that standard for some age based regulations, like school, drinking age, voting age, and draft. Which kind of makes sense; everyone born in X year gains those things at the same time. A less arbitrary cut off date for schools, no awkward math whe checking IDs, just born in '04, you're good.'

    Still seems confusing having 3 ages in different contexts though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Fun fact: up until fairly recently, babies weren't often named until at least their second birthday. Hence, headstones with "baby", "junior", etc. littering pioneer graveyards and similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    That kinda makes sense. Giving a name before knowing how the childs behaviour, temperament or similar is rather unintuitive. Also probably makes the loss a bit less hard if the child dies before it's at least a year old, which is probably the root cause for that costume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    It was also counted from the beginning of the year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asian_age_reckoning but they oficially switched in 2023

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    This has always bothered me about the bullshit pro-life argument. If life starts at conception, then clearly we're making people wait an additional 9 months to vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    There is actually one problem with counting age from birth: premature babies are behind on everything! Of course we could correct that by saying that they were minus three months old when born (or however early they are).

  • source
  • parent