Open Source

hideshow 10 child comments

[–] shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Yes, and their donations are limited to 100k a year per corporation/organization, so there cant be a company who comes, donates 20million and then tries to gain control of them through money

parent

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Yes, and their donations are limited to 100k a year per corporation/organization

Interesting that they did that.

parent

[–] joshchandra@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago*

Frankly, that's really cool and I think all NPOs capable of doing that should follow suit... though I suppose that paves the way towards ghost or shell companies sneaking in that way... Hmm...

parent

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Yes, it is still independent. Cloudflare is just one of the three Platinum sponsors. Other two are Shopify and FUTO. Proton is also a sponsor, but in Gold tier, iirc.

parent

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Shopify being a sponsor makes it highly suspect instantly.

parent

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 22 points 11 months ago

Andreas (lead engineer) has told the story of how he got that money - they just happen to know each other and $100k is peanuts for the Shopify founders.

But you’re right to suspect anything of the sort!

parent

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 13 points 11 months ago (1 child)

I think It's on their charter that no matter how much corporate money they'll get they'll never accept any outside influence just the same. The donators are amply warned to not expect anything other than development as usual or faster.

parent

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago (1 child)

People always imagine this as "I will pay you $100 to kick the puppy" and of course they would never.

But what actually happens is that you have a long-term donor. You rely on their help (they're paying for you to be able to hire a nice college intern who's really smart and has been fun to have on the project). They never tell you what to do so you see them as more of a friend than anything else. It's perfectly normal to get some lunch with friends and talk. You're stuck on some problems and they have some good connections that help you out. That might even be worth more than $100k, but it's not money at all so it's OK that they're helping you like this. They also talk you up, which is like free advertising except you didn't ask for it so that also doesn't count. Anyway, at some of the lunches they're telling you about what's going on with them and there's some problems they're dealing with that you could help with. They don't ask for help, of course, because they know you're independent. But being independent means it's OK for you to do what you want. Even help a friend out who didn't ask for help so they're not influencing you...

parent

[–] verdi@feddit.org 1 point 11 months ago

This guy politiks

parent

[–] SunSunFuego@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

they stated on their website this project will remain independet and that donators don´t have a say in how this is being developed

parent

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

No browser with third party investors can be really independent, they always will obey more the interests of the investors as on those from the users. Anyway the guys from Ladybird have balls of steel to develope an browser engine from scratch in an market saturated of browsers of any kind and a brutal competition, this would had more sense 15 years ago, but not now. Good luck, maybe in 2029-2030 there is an good browser multi-platform with all the needed infrastructure, servers and extensions, but I'll see to believe.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

How can you say it's saturated when chrome has an effective monopoly. If you look at browser engines, there's basically only 3 for desktop, with one of them targeting only Macs.

parent

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

As said, there are currently three engines + two forks of these (Gonanna and Qt), except some basic render engines from text only browsers (Links, Lynx and some others), but over hundred different browsers which use these engines, + almost 70 abandoned ones, because outdated engines and others which also tried to develope an own engine. This is what I mean with saturated. It's nice to try to release a browser with a new independent engine, but if there are not enough users which also use it, it's a death born child. For some products the market is limited. Make it eg. sense to release a new OS? There also existing only 4, Unix, Unixbased like Windows or Mac and Linux with tons of distros. It's not only the browser engine, in over 20 years there are also growed complete infrastructure arround these engines, dedicated plug ins, extensions, etc, which don't exist for a new indie engine, precisely because other browsers, which also tried to release a new engine, before Ladybird, are currently all death. Sad, but you need also a minimum of infrastructure for an browser and which offer also somewhat more as only a new engine. It need security and privacy measures, inbuild or with extensions/plug-ins which need an extra developement and other things more.

parent

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 months ago

No browser with third party investors can be really independent, they always will obey more the interests of the investors as on those from the users.

That's why they limited donations to $100k per organization. No one is allowed to make themselves indispensable to the project.