Jimmy Kimmel will return to air on Tuesday after his show was suspended following comments he made about the death of Charlie Kirk, Disney has said in a statement released in the last few moments.

"Last Wednesday, we made the decision to suspend production on the show to avoid further inflaming a tense situation at an emotional moment for our country," the statement says.

"It is a decision we made because we felt some of the comments were ill-timed and thus insensitive. We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 251 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (44 children)
  • [–] 173 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    Capitalists are incapable of thinking beyond the end of the current quarter

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I hate to open up this particular can of worms, but if you're a "staunch capitalist," why the hell are you here of all places?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    They're a troll, and you're falling for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    The very sad thing is that I don't think this absolute fool isn't a troll at all. I think they mean what they say, which is undeniably worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nah, I do think they're just saying whatever will get a rise out of people.

    Either way, the only winning move is to ignore them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think they thought they could get away with it, like when they fired Colbert. Maybe Colbert worked because it was a year away?

    In case anyone hasn't seen this, I'm posting it again. Here is what Kimmel did that was so wrong. He showed trump completely not care about kirk's death.

    Starts at about 2 minutes.

    Video of monologue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j3YdxNSzTk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Disney is trying to get a monster merger pushed through. And here's the Chairman of the FCC directly threatening them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    It wasn't Disney who have the merger, it was NexStar, an owner of some 39% of local TV stations, that's trying to merge with another company to control 80% of local stations. Current law dictates the limit to 39%, so the federal government has them over a barrel. After the FCC chairman directly told them what to do on a podcast, Nexstar did exactly that and threatened to refuse to air Kimmel if Disney didn't kill the show. Disney did, and now they've capitulated to an actual massive groundswell of Disney+ cancelations. Thus the flip-flop.

    So not only was there blatant corruption in both the private and public sector in a more or less open conspiracy to give a bribe to allow a violation of federal law, but by saying what he said, the FCC chairman also pretty clearly violated the first amendment of the constitution of the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Colbert was given most of a season to carry on and all involved had a long time to figure out options, and there weren't explicit overt threats from government. "How bad could it be if they are letting him keep saying everything he wants for months?". Also people looking to to throw money at South Park which was been gloves off against Trump.

    Kimmel was sudden and with direct specific threats from the government during such a contentuous time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    That's exactly what happened to Bud Light. Bigots hated that BL was partnering with a filthy trans person, and when they caved to the pressure everyone else said "fuck you" but the bigots didn't all come back. It's kind of like Target as well. Present this image of being for the minorities, and then caving under the smallest amount of pressure pissing off everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Target did the same thing. They pissed off both sides and have been hurting for quite a while now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I am out of the loop (by which I mean hi from Europe), what did target do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Target was a big proponent of DEI and LGBTQ+. It was part of the brand and hiring practices. Then, after the orange plauge was inaugurated, they switched their tune. Tgey dropped all their DEI policies and all LGBTQ marketing.

    They are down 50% this year.

    https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TGT/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Target was showing its true colors long before getting rid of DEI practices. Like at one point they had a gay pride line that really just felt like grift then some people took offense to it and they put it all on clearance and moved it to a remote corner of the store. This was soon after unveiling it, not after it sat there a while. Its no wonder they acted the way they did. They just saw liberals and progressives as a way to profit. People got tired of the grift with no real championship towards better attitudes and practices to minorities and boycotted them hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    It's definitely opportunistic backpedalling, but it's a good sign of sorts: We've proven that, if we can punish them financially, they'll do the right thing. For the wrong reasons, obviously, but in these times, I'll take what we can get.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    What were they thinking in the first place?

    FCC threatened to take their licence. They'll force Kimmel to say "we don't know if he was maga" or something and everything continues on eggshells.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I have a feeling Kimmel isn't going to be forced to say anything. He (rightfully) despises Trump with every fiber of his soul and would probably choose to stay off the air rather than bend the knee in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I think you're lionizing Kimmel a bit too much, he just said a few obvious jokes that was likely written by his writing staff. He didn't say anything brave.

    "we’re still trying to wrap our heads around the senseless murder of the popular podcaster and conservative activist Charlie Kirk yesterday... Some people are cheering this, which is something I won’t ever understand.”

    Those who hate Trump and his rhetoric immediately understand why Nazi fascist deaths are celebrated. They don't describe them as senseless while heaping unnecessary praise on them. "Popular activist"? How about racist fascist propagandist?

    He'll toe the line after this correction. Ping me with his return monologue if I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I've watched it. He described Kirk as a young man, choked up while pronouncing violence is never an answer, and praised Howard Stern as a role model of his.

    You think that's brave in the face of Nazis?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    And talked shit about the administration the whole time, which is what this was about in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Yet he went on and on about how wonderful the Nazis in his life are and how much he loves and looks up to them.

    You felt it was adequate? You were satisfied just because he made fun of Trump and his administration?

    Normalizing peace with Nazis and denouncing violence as a solution isn't brave, would have been better to just be quiet. The country needs a revolution, not normalizing hanging out and loving Nazis. Cut the cancer out, these people need to be cast out of society, not praised and consoled when their own actions catch up to them.

    First they came for the communists and all that... When they come to you, they'll be no one left because you decided to have dinner parties with the Nazis.

  • source
  • parent