49
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

If it wasn't overproduced to shit and was just normal, I'd imagine there's lots of interesting stuff in 1970s psych journals.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They had the same ethical guidelines as youtubers today. Interesting? Sure. Scientifically useful? Probably not. Psychopathic? Absolutely.

animal abusehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pit_of_despair

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

:what-the-hell: do not click that, you think you can stomach carnist depravity but like no

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

655 readers
394 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS