you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because the state government would collect the information about which person where signed the disclaimer about not letting kids do whatever and would have that connection between IP addresses and names and everything else they have done. This is not hard to understand.

California is doing what Europe is doing in a sneaky way trying to rat fuck privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The words "disclaimer", "waiver" and "sign" do not occur in the bill. Whatever process you think exists does not, because, again, you haven't bothered to understand what the bill is about. It's not getting anyone to sign any disclaimer, so that information, whatever it might be, cannot be newly collected.

    If you disagree, you need identify - preferably by referencing the actual clauses of the bill that I linked above - what new thing the bill introduces, and what harm that is likely to lead to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The state is collecting a database of which names are which IP addresses that they can use to identify anything anyone has said at any time in coordination with the dad Brokers they can easily buy information from. You are giving me the lawyerly pr bs well ignoring the real purpose here. We both know it. Or I hope we both know it cuz otherwise you are not very observant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    The state is collecting a database of which names are which IP addresses

    Why do you believe this?

    You are giving me the lawyerly pr bs

    I am trying to get you to do the bare fucking minimum to convince me that what you fear has anything to do with this article.

  • source
  • parent