▲ 1640 ▼ A conundrum (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 271 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 child) Its legal because value comes from ownership, not from doing things. And if that sounds insane; you're a fucking commie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Is it ironic? We can't know nowadays. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago The vibe I get is that they mean it as a compliment permalink fedilink source parent [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Im responding to someone saying laws not protecting the weak from the strong is a failure, so i think we're pretty well i!to surrealist nonsense fantasy land. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Is it ironic? We can't know nowadays. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago The vibe I get is that they mean it as a compliment permalink fedilink source parent [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Im responding to someone saying laws not protecting the weak from the strong is a failure, so i think we're pretty well i!to surrealist nonsense fantasy land. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago The vibe I get is that they mean it as a compliment permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago Im responding to someone saying laws not protecting the weak from the strong is a failure, so i think we're pretty well i!to surrealist nonsense fantasy land. permalink fedilink source parent