▲ 181 ▼ The kind of dumbassery I've had to deal with this weekend both IRL and online. Someone kill me please. (sopuli.xyz) submitted 3 years ago by pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca 125 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (18 children) Welp, you're a terrible person then permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -8 points 3 years ago (17 children) Yes only terrible people want to avoid killing people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (16 children) They are when that person they're defending is a rapist, yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (15 children) So let's just be clear here. You're saying that everyone who opposes the death penalty is terrible? How did you come up with that? What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (14 children) You're certainly hot about those strawmen and that's a particularly dumb way to promote rape apologia. Now go read what I said again. Slowly this time. What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? Retards like you are why Tylenol was invented. 🤦 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -8 points 3 years ago (17 children) Yes only terrible people want to avoid killing people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (16 children) They are when that person they're defending is a rapist, yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (15 children) So let's just be clear here. You're saying that everyone who opposes the death penalty is terrible? How did you come up with that? What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (14 children) You're certainly hot about those strawmen and that's a particularly dumb way to promote rape apologia. Now go read what I said again. Slowly this time. What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? Retards like you are why Tylenol was invented. 🤦 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (16 children) They are when that person they're defending is a rapist, yes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (15 children) So let's just be clear here. You're saying that everyone who opposes the death penalty is terrible? How did you come up with that? What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (14 children) You're certainly hot about those strawmen and that's a particularly dumb way to promote rape apologia. Now go read what I said again. Slowly this time. What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? Retards like you are why Tylenol was invented. 🤦 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (15 children) So let's just be clear here. You're saying that everyone who opposes the death penalty is terrible? How did you come up with that? What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (14 children) You're certainly hot about those strawmen and that's a particularly dumb way to promote rape apologia. Now go read what I said again. Slowly this time. What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? Retards like you are why Tylenol was invented. 🤦 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago* (14 children) You're certainly hot about those strawmen and that's a particularly dumb way to promote rape apologia. Now go read what I said again. Slowly this time. What reason would you have for killing a rapist? How is there a positive outcome from that? Retards like you are why Tylenol was invented. 🤦 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (4 children) If you think saying you shouldn’t murder criminals is apologism for crime then you’re more interested in vengeance than justice. There’s times when self defense would require it but this should not be the default. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 7 points 3 years ago* (3 children) If you think a rape victim's unilateral right to guarantee their safety, liberty and happiness is supporting vengeance over justice, then I'll take it. No one who respects human rights will respect a paradigm that protects rapists while ignoring the reality of the situation and prioritizing the status quo over human lives. Imagine being more afraid of vengeance than of mass rape. Jesus Christ, you apologists are depraved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheDankHold@kbin.social -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. If it is necessary to end an immediate threat, then it’s okay. If you hunt someone down later that’s the vengeance and retribution I’m referring to. I don’t want to live in a world where anyone with a deep enough grudge feels justified mowing down the object of their ire. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. It’s very disappointing that you’re so ideologically up your own ass that you can’t have a reasonable discussion with anyone. Automatically assuming the worst so you can rant about how depraved everyone but you is. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) This is you talking past people again to push your uncharitable assumptions of my thoughts. This is you devolving to dumb personal attacks because you don't have a valid point and you know it. You and I are both too old for that shit. Come up with a substantive argument and then we'll talk. Plenty of stories have explored this issue with revenge, recently it was The Last of Us 2 and I thought they did a pretty good job of showing what you do to yourself when you give into violent revenge fantasies. Ohhh, I see what's happening. You're an alt account of the guy I just chewed out. Now it makes sense. My guy, if you're going to use alts to win a argument, the key is to not make it look obvious. You need to not use cookie cutter arguments and you certainly need to change around the type of reasoning you give, and use different examples in each account, so no one suspects anything. Look in the mirror, get some self awareness, and go to therapy. Lol the projection is real. Go outside and touch grass. And grow the fuck up and stop being a rape apologist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social -5 points 3 years ago Am I an alt? If anything you just can’t read usernames. It’s funny that you accuse me of personal attacks considering everything you said to me and accused me of. Shows that you’re far from an intellectually serious person. I’ve had my fun talking to a brick wall so I wish you well. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -7 points 3 years ago (8 children) I smell projection. Your comments are basically non sequiturs. I'm also not sure you understand how to use Tylenol. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (7 children) You only smell your own shit you get off on inhaling after drinking the tears of rape victims. My comments are morally correct and in keeping with the concept of natural rights, and that scares you because it conflicts with your own ideas of social and moral progress. Indeed, all rape victims do, because their circumstances justify the violence you seek to eradicate from the world -- while defending rapists who commit that same violence on the regular -- because you don't want to admit to yourself that your fantasies have very real and very negative consequences on the most vulnerable people. You only care about yourself. That's why cheap rape apologia like you're peddling is evil, and no one should listen to it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -6 points 3 years ago (6 children) I'm afraid of all rape victims? Lol you're really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I'm happy to watch you tire yourself out though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (5 children) That's strawman #2 you're busting out. You clearly can't deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald's and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can't have that. You have a LOT of privilege to check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children) You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -5 points 3 years ago (2 children) Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don't have any alts LOL. Proving my point. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz [S] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking? Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one? Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people? Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can't count? But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 years ago I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me. I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple. I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous? Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me. I have never apologized for rapists. Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions? permalink fedilink source parent