you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Who is going to pay for it if a country doesn't have a foster care/orphanage programme? The children and orphans, with their lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Not only that, it effectively takes potential people out of the workforce. It also gives people no reason not to be deviants leading to higher expenditure on enforcement and incarceration. Not to mention potential higher crime rates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I'm confused too. It lists programs aimed at helping people become productive members of society, so my best guess is it's suggesting not paying for these programs would lead to social issues that have a larger cost.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If society pays for things that eliminate individuals' needs before they begin to suffer from them, society doesn't have to pay to incarcerate or rehabilitate them when they turn to destructive behavior to cope with or reduce that suffering.

  • source
  • parent