162
Bad empanada? More like bad take haver (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/slop@hexbear.net
166 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://xcancel.com/BadEmpanadaCPS/status/1960860509193773141#m

BadEmpanada posts "At this point I'm open to the idea that for a lot of otherwise unremarkable, horrible white people, being trans is mostly a way to claim a marginalized identity to hide behind", someone responds "No. It's not. " and BadEmpanada says "Yes it is"
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 1 year ago (16 children)

We dont "need" BE. He isnt even a self-professed marxist. Just because he speaks with an righteous fervour, does not make him “morally forthright” (this idealism plagues our leftist movements). His disgusting behaviour towards BayArea (an actual POC) and horrendous take on Donbass is evident of his uselessness towards our movements.

Despite actually being right about Hassan and other left pop stars. Yet just because he is right sometimes doesnt mean he is right forever. He does not offer a future. Not to himself nor to anyone really. He is a hurt man and therefore lashes out.

The world is changing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    His disgusting behaviour towards BayArea

    I'm afraid to ask and yet I must know

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    He doxxed bayareas415, causing him to lose his job as a lawyer and receive death threats.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Any reason why?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    horrendous take on Donbass

    brow summary? i'm not up on streamer drama

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Basically denying that leftist/donbass freedom fighters existed, russia somehow twisted the narrative to seem it more popular than it was. So while he concedes crimeans wanted to be russian (which most do at this point tbh) the donbass didnt because 47% of the donbass chose to identify as Ukrainian (which is not how their identity works in that region)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    lol it's even internally contradictory. if donbass was puppet regime, it's nonsense to concede crimea not being one.

    the legitimacy/popularity of DPR LPR is pretty passé these days though, they're gone and the political question is superceded by nato/eu

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yeah it is.

    the legitimacy/popularity of DPR LPR is pretty passé these days though, they’re gone and the political question is superceded by nato/eu

    They took the heaviest casualties, and then were marginalized with the arrival of the main russian force. It was a double bind for them. But anyways, he implied that russia conjured the whole separatist thing up in the first place (donbass only became separatist in response to the nazification and increasing hostility by Ukraine).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    if anything has become clear as time has gone on it's how meek russia had been in the donbass, it's really difficult to imagine them being on the cutting edge of manufacturing separatism when their actual deployment of soldiers there was completely inadequate lol

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent