2157
Language (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
274 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/115093185284473606

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

Megacorps gonna megacorp.
Monopolies gonna monopoly.

We can fight these giants by not using their services & products.

It only gets harder to fight them the more we give in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I can't even get people to switch to LibreOffice, not cuz they use some advanced MS Office feature but because the interface "looks dated". So they'd rather pay a subscription for life to use software that spies on them than download free software that does what they need but has a 2010s style interface.

    Humans suck so much.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Humans are creatures of habit, and risk averse most of the time. Risk, being change of any sort when things seem "stable."

    All you can do is lead by example and enjoy life and tell those poor souls they're stupid for spending money for something they can change the look like MS Office easily.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Ngl, I installed a few OnlyOffices just because of UI.
    It has ribbon UI and about the same placement of buttons as MS Office stuff.

    It's fine.

    (Based in Latvia, but they had a Russian momma, now Singapore.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    because the interface “looks dated”.

    The real issue is M$ intentionally not following standards, so that opening an Office doc may or may not properly render in other suites. Hooray for EEE. Fuckers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Eh, I haven't had that issue in years. Maybe its a problem for office workers who make extremely complicated documents and spreadsheets, but those aren't the kinds of people I'm talking about.

    EDIT: Not implying you're wrong about M$ fake open standards bullshit, just that I don't think its a huge concern for the average home user.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I get what you are saying but is it really too much to ask for an interface that looks like it belongs there?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I prefer the old school style menus and such. I stopped using MS Word around the time that they came out with the 'ribbon' style menus or whatever it's called, so if they 'update' it I sure hope it's as an option or a fork.

    I can understand people who grew up with it or who have spent years using it might like it better though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not willing to pay for it, are you? If no then its to much to ask.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, it’s too much to demand but simply asking they keep the interface as clean looking as any other free cross platform open source project is not an outlandish request.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    They update the ui in most of their patches, theyve made the ui incredibly customisable. They have the classic header or a ribbon header. Its open source software it can't afford a redesign every few years to keep up with Microsoft design trends. The team is like 8 people.

    I might be wrong but i feel like the people complaining about the ui dont really even use it. After a week of using it you get used to it and it looks normal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I can use libreoffice. I just don’t. My Mac has Apple numbers and pages and they are enough for me and when I finally make the jump to Linux full time I’ll just have to adapt to libre again. But this is a complaint that many others have which is why I bring it up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    For legally free and open software that has to maintain UI consistency across Windows, MacOS, and the plethora of open desktop environments? Yes, yes it is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No it’s not. There are other free and open software offerings that function cross platform and do it more cleanly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    For a project as big and old and full of legacy code as LibreOffice, I think their interface is pretty great. And its way more customizable than MS Office. Its just not the absolute latest and greatest in styling.

    And, if MS didn't make it so hard to maintain compatibility with their "open" file format, TDF might be able to put more resources into UX. As it is, they have to reverse engineer all the nonconforming BS that Microsoft puts in their OOXML implementation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent