False dichotomy, not false equivalency. Two different things.
if I have a choice to be policed by Chauvin or Thao, there is no question that I choose Thao.
Right here is the false dichotomy, considering the context of the comment this was written in reply to (the one by meatbridge) being a metaphor for voting, equating Chauvin to Republicans and Thao to Democrats.
You frame it as if we only had two choices. Which is verifiably wrong.