you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    First, wildcat strikes, and strikes in general, were never legal per-say. They became legal when the US finally concluded that they could not stop unions from forming and strikes from disrupting production.

    Second, the NLRB's existence was specifically for the purposes of reducing interruptions in industrial production. The NLRB were never an efficient means of getting what you wanted/needed at work, they were mostly just a low-risk means of applying fines to an abusive employer.

    The labor wars are coming back in style, most likely. It'll only be a matter of time before armed strikes and similar matters start happening again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago

    The recent Air Canada strike is a good example of what happens when the government gets too comfortable shutting down labour actions arbitrarily. If you make labour actions illegal, then workers will do illegal labour actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago

    It would come down to exactly which portions of the NLRA (etc) are struck down. And I think any legislative revisiting of the NLRA will be sure to make any substantive labor actions illegal.

  • source
  • parent