submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was wondering with all the talk of NACS, what would happen to J1772. I think I found the answer, unless folks here see it differently. Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

What is the currently maximum available performance of NACS?

CCS is designed up to 1000V and 500A. Charging stations offer typically up to 350 kW.

What do the available NACS charging stations offer? As I remember Tesla is only using 400V batteries, so with 500A they only get up to 200kW.

So the switch to NACS sounds like a performance downgrade. But yes: probably a usability upgrade but at the cost of longer charging times.

Is Tesla planning to switch to 800V too? So they can deliver more performance?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

While they are only 400v, at least here in Europe we get up to 250kW charging for a short while. But that is why CCS2

load more comments (6 replies)

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023

33 points (97.1% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to [email protected])

3370 readers

1 users here now

We have moved to:

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No self-promotion.
No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
No trolling.
Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS