108
[DISCUSSION] :israel-cool: Referendum
(hexbear.net)
A workshop for the memes of production.
Submit new emoji here.
A good submission is:
Rules:
-- @WhyEssEff-- @WhyEssEffEmoji are added to the codebase periodically. Emoji may or may not be accepted and the dev team has final decision.
All images submitted must be ones you have the right to share with the project. By posting images in this comm, you are agreeing that you have permission to share this image with the project.
Hexbear Code Of Conduct, ToS, Privacy Policy, etc all still apply.
Emote repository, periodically updated on the Hexbear Code-Op.
You called it a "Holocaust emoji" literally an hour before saying it's fine to have it and it's just "awkward" representation. That seems like a pretty quick (and major) shift in sentiment, especially considering you gave site bans out for long-time contributors disagreeing with a position you changed your mind on within an hour.
Could you, I don't know, unban Z and just ignore posts that upset you or disagree with you unless they actually require mod action (like they have slurs or threats in them)? Is it really necessary to ban people for taking a different position than you (even if abrasively)? [and ignoring that you are now saying you are taking the position that the emoji is fine]. Is there no room to extend any form of grace in arguments that ultimately don't actually harm you?