108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
108 points (99.1% liked)
Slop.
797 readers
587 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Overall, that paper is mostly the same as this one, comparing "tankie" subreddits to demsoc and anarchists ones and drawing the same conclusions about "muh extremism".
I then noticed this claim:
Seemed suspicious. They cite a Time article about harrassment on Reddit that mentions in passing:
The sources for these two claims are two posts on r/chinareddits. This is like Ethan Klein sourcing all his Hasan footage from r/destiny. The post for the latter claim has been deleted by the creator, but for "users [verbally] attacking Uyghurs" the evidence is this:
Users piling on a "Uyghur activist" who works in motherfuckin' Guantanamo Bay.
And just this one person, so talking about harrassmnt of "Uyghurs" plural is unsubstantiated extrapolation.
Haha, I remember that shitshow, even for
it was a little too much to claim that Uyghurs in Guantanamo Bay had it better than the ones living normal lives in China.
There are a lot of people asking questions about my "we don't force feed muslims pork" t-shirt that I feel are answered by the t-shirt
Time put this nonsense between Hindutva Islamophobia and Portuguese racism
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.