▲ 2032 ▼ YSK that Gerrymandering allows politicians to determine election outcomes by changing electoral maps. In most western countries, it's illegal. Gerrymandering is common in the United States (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world 337 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] astutemural@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago (3 children) Ah yes, because there are only two parties. This is entirely an emergent property of FPTP voting. Just do PPV or something, smh my head. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago smh my head yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago Not necessarily of two-party systems or FPTP, I think this is a property of single-member districts in general. If you have multi-member districts (say 4 or 5 representatives per district) this becomes much less effective. Statewide PR solves this by removing districts, which for most people isn't ideal. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah, just get the winner of a 2-party FPTP system to change the rules that got them elected and instead put in place a PPV system that will ensure they never again get a majority. ezpz permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) a PPV system that will ensure they never again get a majority. Are you saying the two party system doesn't represent the people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago No system completely represents the people, but sorting people into only A or B is worse than systems that allow more categories. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago smh my head yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago Not necessarily of two-party systems or FPTP, I think this is a property of single-member districts in general. If you have multi-member districts (say 4 or 5 representatives per district) this becomes much less effective. Statewide PR solves this by removing districts, which for most people isn't ideal. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yeah, just get the winner of a 2-party FPTP system to change the rules that got them elected and instead put in place a PPV system that will ensure they never again get a majority. ezpz permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) a PPV system that will ensure they never again get a majority. Are you saying the two party system doesn't represent the people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago No system completely represents the people, but sorting people into only A or B is worse than systems that allow more categories. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) a PPV system that will ensure they never again get a majority. Are you saying the two party system doesn't represent the people? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago No system completely represents the people, but sorting people into only A or B is worse than systems that allow more categories. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago No system completely represents the people, but sorting people into only A or B is worse than systems that allow more categories. permalink fedilink source parent