18
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Preamble We are in the midst of a Gerrymandering war, and it seems to me that the simple solution would be to switch from FPTP to Proportional. Current politicians should want it because they wouldn't have to survive primaries anymore and be able to keep their seats in the party or be influential in the new party structure. Citizens should want it because it would break apart the 2 party system, make every vote count, and finally make us represented.

The Amendment

Section 1- The legislatures of the several states shall be unicameral and elected therein by a system of proportionality where the number of seats a political party gets in the legislature is equal to the proportional share of the votes. All local councils wherein the total number of residents is greater than or equal to One-Hundred-Thousand, or where the number of elected legislative officials is equal to or greater to Twenty-Five shall also be required to have proportional elections.

Section 2- The election of the House of Representatives in the United States federal government shall no longer have seats be apportioned to each state on account of population, the house will henceforth be starting during the next election be elected via a single vote where eligible voters will vote for a party and the parties will get the total number of seats proportional to the total number of votes received. The total number of seats for the house will be set at One-Thousand.

Section 3- Each of the state legislatures shall hold an election amongst themselves where members of the state legislature who are Thirty years of age or older may put their name in contention for election to the senate, each member of the state legislature will then cast a ballot where they rank each candidate from most to least preferred, if no person wins a majority of first preference votes then the candidate with the least number of first preference votes will be out of the running and the second preference of their votes will be added to the total, so on and so forth until one candidate reaches a majority. In the event of deadlock the Governor of the state will break the tie.

Section 4- Each state shall be required to register every citizen over the age of 18 to vote automatically and shall provide free of charge a voter identification card is identification is required to vote by state law, and no person shall be removed from the voter rolls unless proof of death, change in residency or revocation of citizenship.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

There are lots of things to consider here. I will start with just a few:

  • State governments have their own Sovereignty, apart from the Federal Government. Each State has its own Constitution, and any power in the Federal Constitution not explicitly given to the Federal Government goes to the States (and to the People). So what you are proposing here requires changes at the State level as well. And not every state may sign on.

  • you are definitely on to something by increasing the size of Congress. Congress used to increase every 10 years due to the population increase in the census. Then, roughly 100 years ago, they couldn't agree on how to increase it and left it static. This has many repercussions : the average district has 760k people in it, which is a huge number. But the largest district is almost 1 million, while the smallest is 542k. So there is a much larger variety in representation that we all think. If Congress had 1000 members, we could split everything up more equitably.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

75% of States would have to approve the amendment. Most of the constitutions don't have the type of election system in them. Switching to only one chamber would be the biggest change but most are redundant

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

No, you don't get my point. 49 states already have bicameral state legislatures in their own Constitutions (one state is unicameral). So this idea, as written, can't progress unless those 49 States Constitutions are amended.

Since the federal government already gave that power to the States, it can't claw it back without their consent.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The only part of the constitution that requires unanimous consent to repeal is the US senate, the states give up power to the federal government not the otherway around. There is no functional difference between a unicameral legislature and bicameral legislature that is elected in the same way.

If the constitution is amended and it goes against a state constitution then the state constitution automatically changes as its inferior to the national constitution.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
18 points (90.9% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

926 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS