you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

Don't they drive a car? and ride a train? so combustion works... kind of has to work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Pretty sure wizards are familiar with old technology like trains and cars. But like another comment said, muggles are advancing while wizards stagnate in their old ways and traditions and shit since they keep themselves so separated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Combustion is very old technology. Putting it inside a different machine (e.g. a gun or a car engine) doesn't change the chemistry. If you want to get right down to it, we're just talking about oxidation - which means that in any sort of world where rapid oxidation doesn't work (i.e. explosives), your lungs also don't work because you need that oxygen bonding with the iron in your hemoglobin or you die.

    If you can light a fire, you can make an explosion. If you can make an explosion, you can use it to launch a projectile.

    There's no world in which fire exists but guns are impossible. Even if you don't have the metalworking sophistication for a modern gun, you could still make a Chinese-style gunpowder rocket.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is a world with flying broomsticks and cars, teleportation, and even time travel.

    Of course you can get away with saying gunpowder just doesn't explode here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    For all we know the hogwarts express runs on magic and so does the car, after all it flies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    For all we know the hogwarts express runs on magic

    It makes steam.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Combustion, sure, but not an explosion. Or the car is a special magic car or whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Combustion, sure, but not an explosion.

    I hate to do this to you, but that’s kind how explosions work (i.e. combustion).

    Edit: I should’ve done my homework.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    More specifically, that's how cars with a combustion engine work: lots of tiny explosions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    No, they're a combustion event. An actual explosion (detonation, pre ignition) is really bad news for an engine.

    Firearms use a self oxidising propellant, so it would be quite easy to say that just doesn't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What, pray tell, do you think is in gunpowder? It's not magic dust that goes bang. It's a pre-mixed, pre-compressed mixture of fuel and oxidiser. When used in a gun, whether it's a muzzle-loader or a cartridge, the confined combustion of the mixture generates thermal energy and expanding gases that impart kinetic energy on a moving component (the piston or a projectile). The only difference is that the combustion event in an ICE is subsonic (deflagration) while the combustion in a gun is supersonic (detonation).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The only difference is that the combustion event in an ICE is subsonic (deflagration) while the combustion in a gun is supersonic (detonation).

    So what you're saying is there's a fundamental difference between the two?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yes, there are differences. That's why one is called deflagration and the other is called detonation. Good job, you can read. But the chemical and thermodynamic processes are identical, and that's what you seem to misunderstand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Explosions are combustion.

    And really we're just talking about oxidation. If oxidation works (which it must, because the characters are breathing) then chemically-propelled projectiles must also work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments