▲ 872 ▼ Nintendo can disable your Switch 2 for piracy in the U.S., but not in Europe, as confirmed by its EULA (en.as.com) submitted 1 year ago by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/games@lemmy.world 135 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) Worst argument ever. Why wait for it to happen instead of acting proactively? Why did they feel the need to implement that in A their legal speak and B partly acted on it (users of the MIG-cartridge got already hit by that). Because they will at some point use the power. Why even risk that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] missingno@fedia.io -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Fixating on a hypothetical when it's the opposite of what's actually happening borders on misinformation. Scroll back up, this conversation started with the top comment saying it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and then y'all come at me saying it's actually bricks. It's online bans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) The actual text of the EULA states: "You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.” So no, it's not misinformation, Nintendo is straight up telling you legally that they can and will do this. This is not a hypothetical. They may not have done it yet but there is no uncertain terminology around their ability and willingness to do so. The fact that they can even threaten this in their EULA is a huge warning flag that everyone in this thread is correct to be upset about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] missingno@fedia.io -4 points 1 year ago Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Let me rewind to the start of this conversation. prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware. That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] missingno@fedia.io -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Fixating on a hypothetical when it's the opposite of what's actually happening borders on misinformation. Scroll back up, this conversation started with the top comment saying it should just be online bans, I said that it is, and then y'all come at me saying it's actually bricks. It's online bans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) The actual text of the EULA states: "You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.” So no, it's not misinformation, Nintendo is straight up telling you legally that they can and will do this. This is not a hypothetical. They may not have done it yet but there is no uncertain terminology around their ability and willingness to do so. The fact that they can even threaten this in their EULA is a huge warning flag that everyone in this thread is correct to be upset about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] missingno@fedia.io -4 points 1 year ago Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Let me rewind to the start of this conversation. prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware. That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) The actual text of the EULA states: "You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part.” So no, it's not misinformation, Nintendo is straight up telling you legally that they can and will do this. This is not a hypothetical. They may not have done it yet but there is no uncertain terminology around their ability and willingness to do so. The fact that they can even threaten this in their EULA is a huge warning flag that everyone in this thread is correct to be upset about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] missingno@fedia.io -4 points 1 year ago Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Let me rewind to the start of this conversation. prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware. That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] missingno@fedia.io -4 points 1 year ago Because regardless of what some boilerplate legalese says, they are instead doing online bans. Let me rewind to the start of this conversation. prevent access to online services...that's all they should be allowed to do. I don't think I'd be able hold back on any company that decided what I do with MY hardware. That is what they do. It's an online ban, you can still use a banned console offline. permalink fedilink source parent