11
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I mean im guessing its because it may not be as profitable, or atleast at first, boycotts or directly just capitalism fucking everything up? i legit always imagine aliens seeing us still use coal while having DISCOVERED IN 1932

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Well you can look at the rollout of renewables vs Nuclear in the UK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycNqII5HYMI

tldr: Nuclear power plants are expensive to build (complicated to build), expensive to run (need well trained staff to handle the complexities), the stuff that they run on (Uranium) isn't easy to acquire, and on top of all this the waste product is difficult to dispose of, I believe in Germany for example when the power company shut down its Nuclear power plants it told the Germany government they can deal with the nuclear waste... so basically even though the german people get 0% of their power from nuclear power plants they pay every day to store the nuclear waste from previous ones that are no longer operational...

... and when things go wrong they REALLY go wrong

Coal on the other hand is relatively cheap, the technology is fairly simple, running them is fairly cheap, there's no radioactive waste the coal power plant has to deal with etc

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

There's no waste to get rid of

It just flies up into the atmosphere for free, indeed

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
11 points (59.0% liked)

Green Energy

3040 readers
131 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS