I'm not sure how to write this without it sounding like ragebait or a fed post.
But why do most fellow Marxists critically support Russia today?
I can understand having seen Russia as a potential temporary ally or a necessary power that can stand against US / NATO hegemony over the globe. In short I can understand it from a strategic standpoint.
But what about morals of this?
To explain I've seen seen Russia as a necessary potential ally in the past too. But that has changed with the Ukraine war and concurrent events in Russia.
The way I see it, even with a CIA coup, a full scale invasion of a country still isn't justified. It's bordering on insanity in my mind to start such a war. The way the war and conscription is handled in Russia is also highly critiquable. The way people who fall from grace, also "fall out of windows" too.
The other major event that made me doubt Putin more was part of the leaks that happened with Navalny's death. Specifically the revelation of how Putin spend hundreds of millions not just on a palace like so many corrupt leaders and dictators do, but essentially what amounts to an own private town.
This is what lead me to believe that Putin devolved into insanity and paranoia from what he used to be, a calculated sensible dictator.
With all this in mind, why should we offer critical support to Russia instead of Ukraine?
Yes you can argue that Ukraine has been taken over via a pro-western coup regime, but they're still not the aggressors in the war.
I find it morally questionable to support an aggressor in such a clear scenario. And purely strategically speaking with how Russia is bogged down in Ukraine, I find their military capabilities not great either for any conflict with NATO.
Do any of you have any moral reasoning to critically support Russia? Or do you support it out of strategic reasons despite moral objections?
Yes they are.
How so? Ukraine deployed the military to its eastern regions to crush opposition protests and possible secessionist movements. But that's still an internal affair. Not an attack on another nation.
Ukraine was engaged in ethnic cleansing for 8 years with the ambition to become another Israel. By 22, one million people had fled to Russia from Ukraine. After 8 years, Russia intervened by recognizing the breakaway republics and answering their calls for help. Was this technically illigal under international law? Yes, the breakaway republics were not officially recognized by most countries.
Was it provoked by Ukraine? YES. For 8 years, constantly, with full support of the West. Ukraine wanted this war and did everything sans marching into Russia to get it (there were rumbors of incursions into Russia just before the SMO tho, make of that what you will. Considering what the ukrainian forces got away with during that time, it might have been more than rumors). And now the nazis in Kiew cry because they get their shit kicked out of them.
That's authoritarianism. Zelensky was killing his own people. Freedom and democracy demanded a humanitarian intervention.
Believe it or not, the moral thing to do when a country is committing a genocide at your borders is to intervene.