I feel like i've read a very similar argument somewhere recently, but i have difficulty remembering it precisely. It went something like this:

• If a company kills 5 people, it was either an accident, an unfortunate mishap, a necessity of war (in case of the weapons industry) or some other bullshit excuse.
• If the people threaten to kill 5 billionaires, they're charged with "terrorism" (see Luigi Mangione's case).