728
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 139 points 2 days ago

Dropping F-bombs to the press, calling AOC stupid, and Schumer a Palestinian this morning. Dude’s gonna be shitposting the whole way to The Hague. Can’t wait for the next two days of NATO summit highlights from this very stable genius.

[-] [email protected] 88 points 2 days ago

I can't believe that at this point anyone actually believes that the Orange Jackass will ever suffer any actual punishment.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago

This is legit why people started to believe in Hell- to think there is some kind of justice in the world even if there doesn't seem to be any. Before the late BCs, most people in the Mediterranean didn't believe in Hell, at least as a place of eternal torment for the wicked. They believed in an afterlife that was pretty bleak, but everyone went there. The ancient Greeks and certain Jewish sects began to imagine separate portions of the shared afterlife for particularly evil of righteous people to be punished or rewarded in after death. For the Greeks, these were Tartarus and Elysium, and for the Jewish sects these were Gehenna and Paradise. These concepts arose, particularly within Judaism, as a way to answer the question "why do good things happen to bad people, and why do bad things happen to good people?" And the answer was that the good would be rewarded and the evil tormented in the end, even if things look bad in this life. These ideas were floating around in the time and place Christianity arose, and became incorporated into it.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

This is legit why people started to believe in Hell

This, and monotheism. You can't have an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent deity if there's observable evil in the world unless "it's all part of God's plan," and/or "people reap what they sow"

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Well, one can, it just wasn’t a good fit for the Abrahamic set.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Does Zoroastrianism not figure into this somewhere? It's generally considered an influence on Judaism that is older than Judaism & ancient Greek tradition. They also have an idea of divine justice in the afterlife with concepts roughly corresponding to heaven, purgatory, hell.

Neither Zoroastrianism nor Judaism consider "hell" a place of eternal torment, more a place where spirits confront their actions to cleanse & purify themselves before reuniting with the divine.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My comment about The Hague is referring to the NATO summit in The Netherlands happening today and tomorrow.

Otherwise, I expect he’ll fuck off to a non-extradition Middle Eastern country after his presidency. He’s building enough resorts to have several options.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Yeah the Trump family has made a billion dollars every month that he’s been president.

Maybe he’ll just live on this billion dollar private island his family bought

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/24/trump-family-kushner-undeveloped-island-mediterranean-sazan-albania

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

He'll live in a private country his family bought. He's the president of it right now.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Now typically, I’m against open-air above-ground nuclear tests, but I would make an exception in this case

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why nuclear, though? That ruins the land for everyone, and it's really just the infestation that needs solving. Don't burn your house down for termites — unless it's literally just termites holding together? 🤢

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The island filled with unexploded ordinance sounds like a great place for them actually. I like this idea

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

He's an 80 year old man in increasingly poor health. Wherever he goes after his presidency, if he even makes it that long, he won't be able to enjoy his life the way he wants to. I find some small measure of comfort in that thought.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He is minting his own currency, which he is using as a vehicle to personally raise billions of dollars, while holding an office in the public trust. His life after the Presidency (assuming he relinquishes it on time in the first place) will be far better than the lives of the people his goons have kidnapped.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

That doesn't mean he'll get to do what he wants. He loves playing golf and sexually assaulting women. Soon enough he won't be able to force his body to do either of those things. Of course he'll live better than most but he still can't bully old age and that's a fact that I look forward to watching him confront.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

He’s always been able to afford good enough lawyers to delay any proceedings for years, and he can’t have very many left. Given his open grift and straightforward bribes, monetizing the office, I image he’s finally the billionaire he always claimed to be, so he can afford it

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Truth social going public through that shell company made him a billionaire on paper. If he gets to the point where he's allowed to sell, he could become a legit actual billionaire.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But he also has a personal 747, all that meme coin, huge profit on sneakers, etc

And don’t forget the superPAC money covering legal and other personal expenses

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean, that 747 has to have more in maintenance paid than it's worth, legal expenses covered don't increase wealth, and did he really sell that many of those sneakers?

I think he has been lying about being a billionaire forever, but what I've seen from the (over)valuation of his truth shares it definitely gets him there.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Only really stupid people or money launderers would buy that stock because the moment that fat cunt dies (soon, and painful, hopefully) that app will be a ghost town.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it’s useful to constantly say it… if everyone just shrugs and says “exactly what we thought”, it’s inevitable. stay angry, keep everyone else angry, keep reality that there will be consequences because otherwise the only sure thing is there will be no consequences

the only people that gain by repeating that it’s unlikely that there will be consequences is the people doing horrible things

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

His brain is decaying mush. He'll be shitposting from his deadbed no doubt.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Emphasis on ‘shit’ and ‘bed’

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

We'd all be better off if that bed's prefix came sooner, though, eh?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Almost nobody in Congress lobbies harder for Israel above America than Chuck Schumer. That’s cute Trump thinks he’s resisting.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Dude’s gonna be shitposting the whole way to The Hague.

How cute, people still think Trump will ever suffer repercussions for his actions.

And for the record, it is enshrined in our Constitution that the US doesn't recognize the authority of any foreign body such as the ICC and in fact has laws on the books authorizing military strikes against the Hague if a US citizen is being detained there. Even if Trump were to face a trial, it would be in a US court in front of a US jury.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

He’s literally going to The Hague for a NATO summit. Chill.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
728 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24370 readers
3548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS