▲ 1260 ▼ wtf (mander.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (30 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Back in my reddit days I wrote a long comment about the fact that zombies are scary because they are the ultimate persistence hunters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Zombies aren't scary. They're popular movie monsters because, while looking vaguely human, they're sufficiently "othered" that you can kill them without remorse (thus acting as a convenient stand-in for other groups that the audience wishes they could do that to) and because they represent an apocalypse that kills most of the people but leaves the stuff behind, meaning that you don't have to deal with society anymore but you'll still easily have a roof over your head and food on your table (albeit mostly canned food.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Huh, never thought about it that way. Great metaphor, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago I mean, them being walking corpses might also have something to do with it... permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago I remember reading that permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (12 children) Funny enough there is another animal I know that can sweat, have more endurance than humans, and much faster than humans. Horses. Imagine you fear getting caught by a horse or a human and then suddenly a human riding a horse shows up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children) humans can beat a horse in a marathon! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_versus_Horse_Marathon https://www.managainsthorse.net/result.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (7 children) That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children) The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours. permalink fedilink source parent [+] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year. I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Also in very short races (up to 100m) if the human is an olympic athlete, though mostly because momentum is a bitch and it takes time for the horse to accelerate all that mass, and by the time it's done the race is already over (it also probably helps that the athlete knows what they're doing while the horse is just along for the ride and wondering where it can get some grass). permalink fedilink source parent [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Horses sweat? Huh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago Yeah it turns to foam especially under saddles permalink fedilink source parent [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) It’s a consequence of bipedalism, less energy consumption to run but also slower permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (8 children) It's a few things that stem from bipedalism: We can run and breathe entirely separately. Most quadrupeds lack the ability to run and take breaths independently of the pace of each step. Watching cheetahs sprint, for example, show that they have no choice but to exhale every time their legs come together and inhale every time their legs push apart. Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. We can see further by standing up, and can make tactical decisions based on terrain, while still running pretty much full speed. Combined with our unusual ability to cool ourselves by sweating, this gives us an advantage over pretty much any animal in the heat. Wolves and horses can still outrun humans in the cold, but lack the cooling mechanisms to maintain pace in the same heat that we can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (6 children) We also have by far the best throwing game in the world. Some animals can spit with reasonable accuracy, some apes can kind of lob shit in a general direction, and there's that one lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack. The average man can throw a fist sized rock hard and accurate enough to crack a skull from 20 yards with his bare hand. And we've spent the last 10,000 years inventing newer and more impressive ways of throwing stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children) Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing... permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. And for wanking, although that may just be an adaptation to compensate for our inability to lick our own dicks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Yea but also tools We don’t have to stop for water, we can bring some Same for food Our preys didn’t have such luck permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (5 children) Back in my reddit days I wrote a long comment about the fact that zombies are scary because they are the ultimate persistence hunters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Zombies aren't scary. They're popular movie monsters because, while looking vaguely human, they're sufficiently "othered" that you can kill them without remorse (thus acting as a convenient stand-in for other groups that the audience wishes they could do that to) and because they represent an apocalypse that kills most of the people but leaves the stuff behind, meaning that you don't have to deal with society anymore but you'll still easily have a roof over your head and food on your table (albeit mostly canned food.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Huh, never thought about it that way. Great metaphor, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago I mean, them being walking corpses might also have something to do with it... permalink fedilink source parent [–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago I remember reading that permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Zombies aren't scary. They're popular movie monsters because, while looking vaguely human, they're sufficiently "othered" that you can kill them without remorse (thus acting as a convenient stand-in for other groups that the audience wishes they could do that to) and because they represent an apocalypse that kills most of the people but leaves the stuff behind, meaning that you don't have to deal with society anymore but you'll still easily have a roof over your head and food on your table (albeit mostly canned food.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Huh, never thought about it that way. Great metaphor, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Huh, never thought about it that way. Great metaphor, tbh. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago I mean, them being walking corpses might also have something to do with it... permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (12 children) Funny enough there is another animal I know that can sweat, have more endurance than humans, and much faster than humans. Horses. Imagine you fear getting caught by a horse or a human and then suddenly a human riding a horse shows up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children) humans can beat a horse in a marathon! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_versus_Horse_Marathon https://www.managainsthorse.net/result.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (7 children) That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children) The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours. permalink fedilink source parent [+] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year. I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Also in very short races (up to 100m) if the human is an olympic athlete, though mostly because momentum is a bitch and it takes time for the horse to accelerate all that mass, and by the time it's done the race is already over (it also probably helps that the athlete knows what they're doing while the horse is just along for the ride and wondering where it can get some grass). permalink fedilink source parent [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Horses sweat? Huh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago Yeah it turns to foam especially under saddles permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children) humans can beat a horse in a marathon! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_versus_Horse_Marathon https://www.managainsthorse.net/result.html permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (7 children) That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children) The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours. permalink fedilink source parent [+] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year. I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Also in very short races (up to 100m) if the human is an olympic athlete, though mostly because momentum is a bitch and it takes time for the horse to accelerate all that mass, and by the time it's done the race is already over (it also probably helps that the athlete knows what they're doing while the horse is just along for the ride and wondering where it can get some grass). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (7 children) That's pretty cool. However, no human has ever won by more than 15min, and every horse has a 15min delay built into their times. So even the biggest winning margin of nearly 11 minutes would have lost to the horse if they had started at the same time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children) The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours. permalink fedilink source parent [+] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year. I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children) The horses also all had humans on their backs. To my knowledge, none of the humans had horses on their backs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) For it to be scientifically accurate of a comparison, the ratio of weight:human needs to be equal to that of rider:horse, not a direct flip. In case my phrasing is confusing, to illustrate what I mean here is an example: a 200lb horse carrying a 100lb human is equivalent to a 100lb human carrying a 50lb weight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Things don't scale linearly like that. Many things are proportional to either the surface (so x²) or volume (x³) or complex combinations of those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 year ago Oh true true. I forgot about the square-cube law. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jboy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago The Western States trail in the California Sierras used to be where a 100-mile horse race took place that horse and rider had to complete in 24 hours. At some point in the 1970s one of the riders decided not to take a horse, and he finished in 23 hours on foot. Now it's an annual footrace that the winner finishes in about 14 hours. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago This study analyzes historical results of three different man versus horse races (in Wales, in Virginia, and in California). The data shows that human performance decreases with temperature, but less so than horses, so that 30°C is approximately where the best humans can start outperforming the best horses that year. I would think that even with 15 minutes of intermittent pauses/checks, that time is still productive for cooling the animal and would add less than 15 minutes to the theoretical total if they were allowed to run the whole time. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) Also in very short races (up to 100m) if the human is an olympic athlete, though mostly because momentum is a bitch and it takes time for the horse to accelerate all that mass, and by the time it's done the race is already over (it also probably helps that the athlete knows what they're doing while the horse is just along for the ride and wondering where it can get some grass). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Horses sweat? Huh. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago Yeah it turns to foam especially under saddles permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 point 1 year ago Yeah it turns to foam especially under saddles permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (10 children) It’s a consequence of bipedalism, less energy consumption to run but also slower permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (8 children) It's a few things that stem from bipedalism: We can run and breathe entirely separately. Most quadrupeds lack the ability to run and take breaths independently of the pace of each step. Watching cheetahs sprint, for example, show that they have no choice but to exhale every time their legs come together and inhale every time their legs push apart. Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. We can see further by standing up, and can make tactical decisions based on terrain, while still running pretty much full speed. Combined with our unusual ability to cool ourselves by sweating, this gives us an advantage over pretty much any animal in the heat. Wolves and horses can still outrun humans in the cold, but lack the cooling mechanisms to maintain pace in the same heat that we can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (6 children) We also have by far the best throwing game in the world. Some animals can spit with reasonable accuracy, some apes can kind of lob shit in a general direction, and there's that one lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack. The average man can throw a fist sized rock hard and accurate enough to crack a skull from 20 yards with his bare hand. And we've spent the last 10,000 years inventing newer and more impressive ways of throwing stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children) Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing... permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. And for wanking, although that may just be an adaptation to compensate for our inability to lick our own dicks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Yea but also tools We don’t have to stop for water, we can bring some Same for food Our preys didn’t have such luck permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (8 children) It's a few things that stem from bipedalism: We can run and breathe entirely separately. Most quadrupeds lack the ability to run and take breaths independently of the pace of each step. Watching cheetahs sprint, for example, show that they have no choice but to exhale every time their legs come together and inhale every time their legs push apart. Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. We can see further by standing up, and can make tactical decisions based on terrain, while still running pretty much full speed. Combined with our unusual ability to cool ourselves by sweating, this gives us an advantage over pretty much any animal in the heat. Wolves and horses can still outrun humans in the cold, but lack the cooling mechanisms to maintain pace in the same heat that we can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (6 children) We also have by far the best throwing game in the world. Some animals can spit with reasonable accuracy, some apes can kind of lob shit in a general direction, and there's that one lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack. The average man can throw a fist sized rock hard and accurate enough to crack a skull from 20 yards with his bare hand. And we've spent the last 10,000 years inventing newer and more impressive ways of throwing stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children) Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing... permalink fedilink source parent [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. And for wanking, although that may just be an adaptation to compensate for our inability to lick our own dicks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (6 children) We also have by far the best throwing game in the world. Some animals can spit with reasonable accuracy, some apes can kind of lob shit in a general direction, and there's that one lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack. The average man can throw a fist sized rock hard and accurate enough to crack a skull from 20 yards with his bare hand. And we've spent the last 10,000 years inventing newer and more impressive ways of throwing stuff. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children) Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent [–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children) Humans domesticated dogs for their ability to hunt by scent. Dogs domesticated humans for their ability to throw a tennis ball. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Cats purr and get free shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Cats keep rodents under control so that our stored grain isn't destroyed or contaminated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Mine doesn't. She just yells at me when she wants Fancy Feast. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That and the easy free meals and wamr place to sleep for not much effort in return. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago lizard that can spray blood from its eye, but nothing in the animal kingdom past or present has a human's innate ability for ranged attack I don't know, a hawk plummeting from the sky at 190km/h onto something the size of a small rodent is kind of impressive, too, if you count the bird throwing itself as throwing... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* Running on our hind legs only frees up our hands to be able to use tools and weapons, maybe even water containers for drinking on the go. And for wanking, although that may just be an adaptation to compensate for our inability to lick our own dicks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Yea but also tools We don’t have to stop for water, we can bring some Same for food Our preys didn’t have such luck permalink fedilink source parent