▲ 851 ▼ Why do ICE/fake cops need silencers? (Los Angeles) (discuss.online) submitted 1 year ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world 210 comments fedilink hide all child comments Are they cops? Are the ICE? Are they cosplayers? Source: https://redlib.northboot.xyz/r/LosAngeles/comments/1lfe5gb/ice_brandishing_silencers/
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Single shots from rifles do not cause permanent hearing loss. A better question is how can other cops bring a rifle into a densely populated area WITHOUT a silencer? I dont even know how to respond to this part. Maybe don't have the cops come in with the expectations to use the weapon? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I would prefer the cops not have any guns at all. They would certainly be more polite. If they are going to go do something that would need a gun they need a warrant and then 5 pages of requisition forms filled out in triplicate to request the guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Or we just make it harder to be a cop. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Not commenting on the other parts of this discussion but a single shot from a rifle absolutely CAN cause permanent hearing damage. Even some weapons suppressed are still loud enough to damage your hearing over a short amount of time/multiple shoots. Have you ever seen or watched news of cops shooting someone and NOT firing multiple rounds? Of all the tactical battle rattle these ICE dorks are wearing to capture people, I think suppressors are the least worrisome; should maybe even be mandatory for law enforcement in urban environments. That's coming from my experience shooting in the Marines and being a hobby shooter since then. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago It's not like they've been trained in any de-escalation techniques, if they've been trained at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I would prefer the cops not have any guns at all. They would certainly be more polite. If they are going to go do something that would need a gun they need a warrant and then 5 pages of requisition forms filled out in triplicate to request the guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Or we just make it harder to be a cop. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Or we just make it harder to be a cop. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Not commenting on the other parts of this discussion but a single shot from a rifle absolutely CAN cause permanent hearing damage. Even some weapons suppressed are still loud enough to damage your hearing over a short amount of time/multiple shoots. Have you ever seen or watched news of cops shooting someone and NOT firing multiple rounds? Of all the tactical battle rattle these ICE dorks are wearing to capture people, I think suppressors are the least worrisome; should maybe even be mandatory for law enforcement in urban environments. That's coming from my experience shooting in the Marines and being a hobby shooter since then. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago It's not like they've been trained in any de-escalation techniques, if they've been trained at all. permalink fedilink source parent