▲ 985 ▼ Anon likes trains (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 304 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (18 children) Glorious coal for scenic steam locomotives. It’s a win-win permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (17 children) Still cleaner than even the cleanest electric car, just by physics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) In theory, you could make a carbon-neutral coal-burning steam locomotive. You would need to make synthetic coal out of atmospherically-captured CO2. But in theory it would be possible... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Nope. Thermodynamics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (8 children) Copilot’s deep think says it would take a 2K passenger train to be more environmentally friendly than 2K electric cars, given a coal-steam train and electric cars recharged by a coal fired power plant. But that’s irrelevant, electric cars lose the coolness factor against steam trains. Choo-choo electric drivers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children) copilot's deepthink says I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. Suffice to say that this is not an answer, and if you think it is; you're going to get a lot of people hurt very badly someday. I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked. I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (17 children) Still cleaner than even the cleanest electric car, just by physics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) In theory, you could make a carbon-neutral coal-burning steam locomotive. You would need to make synthetic coal out of atmospherically-captured CO2. But in theory it would be possible... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Nope. Thermodynamics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (8 children) Copilot’s deep think says it would take a 2K passenger train to be more environmentally friendly than 2K electric cars, given a coal-steam train and electric cars recharged by a coal fired power plant. But that’s irrelevant, electric cars lose the coolness factor against steam trains. Choo-choo electric drivers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children) copilot's deepthink says I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. Suffice to say that this is not an answer, and if you think it is; you're going to get a lot of people hurt very badly someday. I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked. I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) In theory, you could make a carbon-neutral coal-burning steam locomotive. You would need to make synthetic coal out of atmospherically-captured CO2. But in theory it would be possible... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Nope. Thermodynamics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) Nope. Thermodynamics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) You'd just be making batteries at that point And the making wouldn't be free permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) And what's wrong with that? Who says the coal has to be a net source of power? Synthetic fuels are actually a pretty viable method of decarbonizing, especially for hard-to-decarbonize applications like aviation. Sure, you don't get net energy out of them, but who cares? Thanks to dirt cheap solar, our civilization has stupidly abundant access to energy. It's only portable energy or energy when we want it that costs a lot. But people have seriously proposed making even gasoline from atmospherically derived carbon. Sure, it's just a fancy battery. But the Joules/dollar you get from the grid is so much cheaper than what you get from gasoline that it may be worth it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) Wouldn't be carbon neutral. /dollar is a fantasy bullshit metric. Joules portable per joule in, joules per weight, joules per area, chemical byproducts per joule, fancy gear and maintenance required. those are what actually matter in the real world. We cannot afford to keep fucking around with childish LARP shit like money. And the best tool we have for carbon capture is still just trees. No process is perfectly efficient, can't be, and all have collateral costs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) It could be carbon neutral. It's all about how you do it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago In some convoluted process where you output a bunch of other stuff; sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (8 children) Copilot’s deep think says it would take a 2K passenger train to be more environmentally friendly than 2K electric cars, given a coal-steam train and electric cars recharged by a coal fired power plant. But that’s irrelevant, electric cars lose the coolness factor against steam trains. Choo-choo electric drivers! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children) copilot's deepthink says I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. Suffice to say that this is not an answer, and if you think it is; you're going to get a lot of people hurt very badly someday. I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked. I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (7 children) copilot's deepthink says I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. Suffice to say that this is not an answer, and if you think it is; you're going to get a lot of people hurt very badly someday. I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked. I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world -1 points 1 year ago* (6 children) Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked. I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here. I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children) Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) baseless A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind. The llm does not. I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes. Or just not said anything unless i had a joke. Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology. No apology, but do have a nice day. permalink fedilink source parent