985
Anon likes trains (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
304 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

There are rough numbers to be foubd, math to be done. Not enough for real work, but enough for guessing a rough course, or knowing when it's close.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Then dont. An llm answer is worse than some shit you just made up on the spot.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    baseless

    A human mind is not random. You would be relating it to something. If you have a mind.

    The llm does not.

    I would have looked up the capacity/fuel burn/output of ay least one engine in each category, then vehicle weight. Two minutes.

    Or just not said anything unless i had a joke.

    Slopping at me in the guise of fact, totally uninteresting deceptive misinformation with no entertainment value is fucking offensive. A person would be ashamed of themselves. I would like an apology.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •