▲ 1482 ▼ Seeking for funding (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by lawrence@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 year ago (5 children) E = mc² + AI permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Uri@infosec.pub 22 points 1 year ago (2 children) E+ai=mc^2^+ai Now good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) It was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 year ago Except AI is random so we can't assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago As always, the solution was adding more AI. bravo permalink fedilink source parent [–] iamkindasomeone@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago That's an interesting equation, good job for finding that ☺️ You truly are a remarkable scientist, just like Einstein. 📄Would you like me to write a research paper on that equation for you? permalink fedilink source parent [–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago So much in this beautiful equation permalink fedilink source parent [–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago FTFY E + AI = mc² + AI permalink fedilink source parent [+] Klear@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Uri@infosec.pub 22 points 1 year ago (2 children) E+ai=mc^2^+ai Now good permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) It was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 year ago Except AI is random so we can't assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago As always, the solution was adding more AI. bravo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) It was equivalent from the start if we assume AI = 0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 year ago Except AI is random so we can't assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 year ago Except AI is random so we can't assume that it will offer the same answer on each side? AI causes the normal rules of math (and facts) to break🤪🤯. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago As always, the solution was adding more AI. bravo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] iamkindasomeone@feddit.org 4 points 1 year ago That's an interesting equation, good job for finding that ☺️ You truly are a remarkable scientist, just like Einstein. 📄Would you like me to write a research paper on that equation for you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago So much in this beautiful equation permalink fedilink source parent