33
Cycling Linked to Lower Risk of Dementia, Study of Half a Million Finds
(www.sciencealert.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)
micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility
2898 readers
58 users here now
Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!
"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.
micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"
Feel free to also check out
It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:
Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.
Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.
Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They had multiple study groups, including walkers. Walkers, cyclers, and mixed (walking and inactive) were the "active travelers" groups.
The article did not call out that they found cycling better than walking, only that
The title and quote from the researchers imply cycling is better than other forms of regular moderate exercise, but provides no supporting statistic for cycling being better. The only statistic quoted was that exercising is better than not exercising.
If the article is going to suggest cycling is better than other activities, they should quote the statistic implying that it is.
My take was more that cycling is one of a few different ways of getting around that was demonstrably healthier for you compared to non-active methods of transport like driving.
At the end of the day, they're all good regardless of which one may or may not be "best" (in other words, anything is far better than nothing).
Also, to be fair, cycling is way faster than walking or running (sometimes it's even faster than driving, especially when you factor in parking+traffic).
I wasn't arguing that cycling wasn't superior for many reasons, only that I didn't like that they didn't quote the specific statistic supporting the claim that cycling was better than walking. I do notice they left out jogging.
Someone else pointed out that there is a graphic in the article that shows cycling>walking; a graphic you don't see if you view websites in text-only mode. I'd have liked to see the supporting statistic in accessibility-friendly text, and not hidden in a graphic, but it is there.