▲ 617 ▼ Anon watches a romance movie (sh.itjust.works) submitted 1 year ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works [M] to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works 114 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) mate, my parents divorced in the 80's, the stigma was REAL permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) There was stigma but that's not the same as it being illegal. The fact your parents ARE divorced proves it was not illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) well there's also the fact this was in Australia. No fault divorce was a huge game changer for the US and other countries - prior to this there had to be a party at fault, and this had to be provable fault. So while it was not technically illegal, it still had a great deal of punitive legalese tied up into it that made it very very hard to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago It was legal. There was no criminal penalty for it and it was handled by the legal system. It being uncommon is not the same as it being illegal. No fault divorce made it easier and more common. It did not legalize it by any definition of that word. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) There was stigma but that's not the same as it being illegal. The fact your parents ARE divorced proves it was not illegal permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) well there's also the fact this was in Australia. No fault divorce was a huge game changer for the US and other countries - prior to this there had to be a party at fault, and this had to be provable fault. So while it was not technically illegal, it still had a great deal of punitive legalese tied up into it that made it very very hard to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago It was legal. There was no criminal penalty for it and it was handled by the legal system. It being uncommon is not the same as it being illegal. No fault divorce made it easier and more common. It did not legalize it by any definition of that word. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) well there's also the fact this was in Australia. No fault divorce was a huge game changer for the US and other countries - prior to this there had to be a party at fault, and this had to be provable fault. So while it was not technically illegal, it still had a great deal of punitive legalese tied up into it that made it very very hard to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago It was legal. There was no criminal penalty for it and it was handled by the legal system. It being uncommon is not the same as it being illegal. No fault divorce made it easier and more common. It did not legalize it by any definition of that word. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago It was legal. There was no criminal penalty for it and it was handled by the legal system. It being uncommon is not the same as it being illegal. No fault divorce made it easier and more common. It did not legalize it by any definition of that word. permalink fedilink source parent