915
Hubris (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
198 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's only "basically impossible" if it's on a firm platform. If it's on a gimbal, like a plastic floating thing, then you don't really now where the tipping point is going to be because it depends on the flexibility of the platform.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably why the bottom is also anchored to the floating work surface. This implementation looks like exactly what you're supposed to do. There's lots of pearl clutching for some reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Safe work sites aren't "pearl clutching".

    Who says this is exactly what you're supposed to do?

    If you're ever working at height and you think it's safer without a harness so you're not killed to death by whatever you're standing on it's probably a good time to reassess.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    those blocks are not that flexible*

    never seen them at festivals or some such?

    they're much stiffer than they appear at first glance!

    ^*if^ ^they're^ ^properly^ ^linked^

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Any flexibility will change the physics.

    Guaranteed the specs on that lift say it can only be operated on the ground.

    Guaranteed the specs on that dock say it's not suitable for supporting anything at any height.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent