29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2379 readers
61 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don’t see the problem. Sure, it’s a bit creepy, but they have the right to see what they are insuring.
Which can be done without a method that produces false positives on reasons to terminate coverage. Part of the premium is them doing due diligence. Satellite photos are not that.
Sure, come inspect the house once a year. I've no issue with that. Some sort of "AI" deciding it doesn't like your roof from a photo? Yeah, no.
They should be required to do an in-person inspection before rescinding coverage. Then, they could use AI to decide where the inspection isn't needed, saving money... but of course they're greedy and don't want to do that.