you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure but it is sorta a treating the symptom and not the disease. Blackrock is right to sue them as a shareholder but companies should not be involved in people's health care to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Can you explain in what way you feel Blackrock is right? Do you feel that people’s lives and healthcare are less important than share holder profits for a company that sells you the promise of covering your medical expenses because that’s what you are specifically paying them to do because they gave you a legally binding agreement to do so? How does a health insurance company insuring healthcare costs put them in the wrong? I really need a clarification here.

  • source
  • parent