How about we start with a just few 3rd party congressmen? That can't be too hard, right? 3 or 4 congressmen not beholden to either party. I'm sure there's at least a couple districts out there that the majority could be swayed if enough focus was put on them.

Then we elect a few more.

Then maybe a senator.

Now suddenly this 3rd party starts getting some attention. It's still by no means a majority, but that's enough congressional votes to give them a seat at the table. When votes are so split and close these days, even a small number of votes can throw things out of order. Demands can start being made.

I'm with you on ranked choice, gerrymandering, and electoral college, but I don't really know how adding more government or senators or SC judges really fixes anything in the long term.

I think the people need to be given more power not the government.

For example, when any government official violates their sworn duties, that should be a much bigger deal than it is. we need to do a better job of holding people's feet to the fire. When Alito flew that flag on Jan 6, that should have been an automatic chance for the people of this country to schedule a vote and demand his removal. This SC justice for life shit needs some stipulations.

But ignoring reality just makes someone into a lifetime loser. There is nothing you can gain by making yourself into a lifetime loser.

He says, in a thread about how the party is so devoted to the losing strategy of pandering right and punching left that it's trying to oust its own vice chair.

As far as I'm aware, most 3rd parties in the U.S. have been some kind of offshoot of the 2 party system rather than an actual uprising of We the People are tired of being led by losers. We all agree on some very basic shit and this other stuff has been a distraction that led us to this point so we could be divided and conquered..

Let's agree to the basic shit, revolt against these dickheads and rebuild something better as Americans.

I think it depends what you mean by revolution, bc DOGE/Yarvin/Thiel and the Heritage Foundation believe what they're doing is revolution, but really it's just removing protections for people and creating new regulations that cement their power grab.

They also will scream non stop what they're doing is to increase transparency, but it's actually just distracting people by pointing the finger at others and hiding what they're really doing in the shadows

It's what the Heritage Foundation did in Russia in the early 90s. Removing protections bc you think they're inefficient only allows the people they were protecting you from to swoop in and take control just like they were hoping for