I’m speaking of a socialist revolution. Not a fascist takeover.

So a Communist takeover. Not much difference in that and a fascist takeover.

“Revolutions” serve people.

Then how come the Russian revolution and the Iranian revolution and the Chinese revolution all killed millions of people much of whom were selected randomly? Why would an unaccountable government that doesn't allow people to chose their own leaders be more likely rather than far less likely to "serve people"