view the rest of the comments
Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Chromium is an open source project just fork it ffs... Also why wouldn't Google just throw gemma into it? This is so dumb, proving that you don't have to be smart to be a CEO just a cult leader
Edit: The article more talks about how Google is being forced to sell off chrome. But then why would they maintain chromium? Wouldn't that just mean the end of that project? Also I'm not saying Google should not be forced to sell it off. I think it'd be good overall
Chromium is a gigantic codebase that requires a team of experts to maintain, tests, and add features to. It's far more complicated than just forking it. If this was easy, then people would've done this a long time ago.
People have done it. It’s called Edge, Opera, Vivaldi etc. And looking at it historically, Safari is a branch from the same tree as well.
These are products maintained by companies with a lot of funding behind them. I'm talking about a community effort to continue developing Chromium if it continues to become shittier.
edit: I'm referring to community forks of Chromium here
Isn't open ai a giant company?
OpenAI is going to have no problems maintaining Chromium. I'm talking about maintenance of community forks of Chromium.