you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

On the one hand, with rising inflation and skyrocketing development costs, I can totally understand why game prices are getting dangerously close to the triple digits. Games rn are cheaper that they ever were yeet yet development is not.

However, that’s still a lot of money and I really wouldn’t wanna pay that.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The money isn't going to developers, and these are billion dollar companies. It's not about development, but unadulterated greed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Doesn’t change that $60 in 2010 are almost $90 today. Devs/publishers aren’t any more greedy than they were 15 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Devs/publishers aren’t any more greedy than they were 15 years ago.

    Looks at the dozens of live service games that have come out in the past decade, with their multiple currencies and premium battle passes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Touché. But that’s a different problem. They don’t even need to raise the base price though, many of them are free to play anyways. And those that both have microtransactions and are full price should be avoided anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They are not more greedy, but they think they got an opportunity now. Games industry is bigger than Film industry. They earn an amazing amount of money due to how many more are playing games now than in 2010 did. Revenue of 2024 was 10 times higher than of 2010....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's absolutely incredible how big the gaming industry is now. Where 20 years ago it was extremely male, and mostly limited to 20-30 year olds now it's everyone! Children and retirees, men and women and everything inbetween or further out to the fringes! And I'm not just talking phone games (which is a gigantic market on its own) at the MSP I work at we've had retired folks bring in gaming computers for service or just drop off older gaming computers for recycling

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is greed, pure and simple. At $60, the industry was more profitable than Hollywood, and they raised the base price of games to $70 just a few years ago before immediately talking about raising prices again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not solely. If you paid $60 for a game in 2010, that‘d be almost $88 today, simply due to inflation. It’s a wonder the prices haven’t skyrocketed any sooner.

    Not that I want that, I‘d prefer games being affordable but it was kinda inevitable considering the way the economy is going…

    Also, I‘d personally rather pay $90 once than have a cheap game with a shitload of micro transactions. Of course, developers/publishers that ask $90 for a game and still include a bunch of micro transactions can fuck right of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "I rAtHeR pAy $420.69 once for an incomplete game then extra $69 for each DLC" - You. Seriously, go back to Nintendo you gooba

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don’t own a Nintendo console older than a Wii and I don’t plan on changing that.

    I also don’t plan on playing games that try to make me pay for it tenfold by enticing me to buy various in-game currencies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I would be a lot more willing to accept the inflation argument if salaries at these companies were going up at inflation rates too.

    In this case though we all know they are not and additionally digital releases not needing to be physically transported and the lack of printed manuals in physical games, for instance, also cuts down on what it costs to make and ship a game today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But the sale numbers are probably much higher nowadays, so it would be feasible to sell games for cheaper. But why would they? People are gonna buy them anyway. Those who won't will get them on a sale later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Those who won't will get them on a sale later.

    /C/patientgamers represent!

    I'll gladly wait 3-5 years to play a $90 retail game for $10-20. There are already too many games in my library to play, I don't need to piss away $100 on a game I'll be bored with in 2 months.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh absolutely, my heart bleeds for the selfless video game CEOs bravely sacrificing their third yacht to keep game prices only $70. Imagine the hardship of cutting executive bonuses down to just eight figures, all so we can enjoy our digital horse armor without paying $99.99.

    These modern saints really are holding the line for the little guy. If only we could all aspire to such noble self-denial.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments