this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
754 points (99.0% liked)

News

28269 readers
4060 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump warned automakers not to raise prices after announcing a 25% tariff on imported vehicles starting April 3, claiming the tariffs would be "great" and benefit U.S. manufacturing.

Industry leaders, including GM, Ford, and Stellantis CEOs, expressed concerns about inevitable price increases, with experts warning tariffs could add thousands to car costs.

Auto suppliers stated that absorbing tariffs is impossible, and dealers fear affordability challenges for consumers.

While the United Auto Workers union support the move as a job creator, trade groups predict higher prices and fewer manufacturing jobs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Funny story.

A while back someone posed a question online. They wanted to know why all Socialist countries fail? I answered that they don't; look at Canada. They told me that I was a fool, because the Heritage Foundation had showed that Canada was freer than the USA. I asked why we shouldn't have Canadian style health care? They never got back to me.

Reminded because of the folks you cited.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Cool little story and all, but Canada is the furthest thing away from socialist.

Socialism is not when the government does stuff. And the more stuff it does, it doesn’t get more socialist. Even if it does A LOT of stuff, it still won’t be communism.

Socialism/communism is the method and path through which the working class will liberate itself. It’s the death of classes and class struggle through the dictatorship of the proletariat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Where did you get the impression that the Marxist definition of socialism was even relevant here? Bringing philosophical jargon into colloquial conversations is basically trolling at this point since philosophical/social studies jargon often use words that have zero semantic overlap with their colloquial counterpart.

Proselytize all you want but if you "um akshully" socialism in a colloquial conversation you will look like an unwashed cave troll at best.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

More precisely, to use Marx's definition: socialism is when workers own and fully control the means of production.

Government services: not socialism, no worker ownership or control.

State capitalism (like China and the former USSR): not socialism, no worker ownership or control.

Historically, the closest things we've seen to socialism so far are worker-owned co-operatives and city- or provincial-level anarcho-syndicalist systems such as the Spanish Anarchists before the fascists murdered them. Some grassroots movements like Podemos and Occupy have also attempted to implement such systems, with brief and limited success.

Again going back to Marx, he expected socialism to be an emergent phenomenon as late capitalism in the most advanced economies becomes unsustainable (he didn't anticipate the transition from feudalism to state capitalism in Russia and China, or its leaders fraudulently calling it socialism). You'll see more attempts to implement worker ownership and control, and you'll see those who get fat off the existing system do everything they can to smack those attempts down. That's where we are now. Then there will be a sort of phase transition that might take the form of a revolution or might be a less brutal change.

Now, whether Marx and his successors are correct in his prediction, only time will tell.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You know, I really don't care how you define the system as long as it works.

I have been people argue about 'socialism' vs. 'social democracy' vs 'communism' since I was in grade school and none of it has done a drop of good for anyone whatsoever.

While people on the Left are wasting time arguing, the people on the Right are voting. They are the ones who keep winning because they keep their eyes on the prize.

Donald Trump is literally throwing people in jail for speaking out, and expanding the Gaza genocide right now, and you're focusing on how I define 'socialism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have been people argue about ‘socialism’ vs. ‘social democracy’ vs ‘communism’ since I was in grade school and none of it has done a drop of good for anyone whatsoever.

If you're unable to clearly define your terms, you're unable to think correctly. Knowing what you're talking about is a good in and of itself.

the people on the Right are voting

That voting is a downstream consequence of a long program of mass manipulation and propaganda, backed with voter-suppression measures. Unless you address that root cause, lecturing people about not voting is a pointless distraction.

and you’re focusing on how I define 'socialism

Making a couple posts didn't take long, and education is part of the process. There can be no revolution without revolutionary consciousness. If you become capable of thinking more clearly, maybe you'll someday be in a position to affect events in a more constructive way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

You know, I really don’t care how you define the system as long as it works.

You never answered the main point.