you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 5 points 2 years ago (8 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You seem to have missed the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think the point was not having a phone with you when you go through security and not about privacy when you are on the other side

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It’s not the traceability of the phone. It’s the contents of the phone.

    The contents of our phones is deeply personal and some courts have ruled that makes them part of the fourth amendment protections, but it’s not made it to the Supreme Court (afaik, ianal) and border patrol doesn’t care as this case makes evident.

    The benefit of a burner phone is that you don’t knock out your primary phone in order to remove “incriminating” evidence like that time your friend texted you that Donald Trump is an orange bellend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment