We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 157 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a result I imagine more users will look at other offerings such as Jellyfin.
https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin
https://jellyfin.org/

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    This might be what it takes to at least get me to install it.

    Do they live well together with the same shared media library?

    Also, are there audiobook clients for Jellyfin?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I found audiobooks to be kind of awkward on jellyfin. I'm now running Audiobookshelf for all my audiobooks, radio shows and podcasts. Together with the Lissen app on Android, it works very nicely!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I've heard rumors that they do play well together, but that's people running it in docker with a "read-only" flag set for the content folder, with metadata saved in the config folder

    I've used the Jellyfin app to listen to audio books, but for my purposes, it's easier to run the separate client/server Audiobookshelf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Makes sense. I’m fully dockerized so I’ve got that going for me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm fully Dockerized (well, uhh... Podmanized) and I'm dual-wielding Plex and Jellyfin. Runs smoothly and both only have read to the content. All management of the media is handled by the *arr stack anyway. I even set up a volume for Plex to throw conversions into that Jellyfin can't see. I'm currently personally using Jellyfin and I'm waiting for Jellyfin to be good enough (or Plex bad enough...) for the users I share with to switch over.

    I can definitely recommend that setup.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I've had Jellyfin and Plex running using the same media directory for a couple years now. I think I had to make a couple small changes for things like seasons of a TV show to show up correctly, but nothing incredibly difficult. Definitely worth setting up and playing with periodically so when you do finally get sick of Plex, you're ready to just switch.

    Only thing I use Plex for exclusively now is when I'm flying, Plex has the Netflix style download option and Jellyfin just downloads the video file. I like Plex's way better just from personal preference.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I haven't used Plex myself but Jellyfin doesn't create any kind of meta files in the library folders. If that is true for Plex as well then I don't see why it would be a problem to point them at the same shared library.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Plex stores its metadata in a special folder, and I’ve got the *arr stack managing the actual media files, so I think I can run them in parallel.

    Looks like I’ve got a project for the weekend! Jebediah’s just gonna have to wait to go to Jool.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    FUCK Emby! What they did was worse than what Plex is doing even now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago*

    Basically, slammed the source code door shut after making promissory statements like "Don't worry, we'll always be open source" for years. With little/no notice they relicensed everything and pivoted to a closed source paywall model.

    No discussion with the community or contributors, no alternatives explored, no polls or surveys. Just woke up one day to a "Sorry, but we're going closed source because moneyyyy" blog post

    Jellyfin was born right after, forked out of vengeance.

    In retrospect we should have seen it coming when they would do odd little things, like keeping the build scripts closed source n crap, but eh hindsight and all that lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Another user said that was because users were modifying the code to avoid supporting the project? I got a lifetime subscription relatively inexpensive and haven't had trouble

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Who said that? I did a search in the thread and no Ody said anything about that that I saw

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments